Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26727092›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2016

How Informed Is the Decision About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy?: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.

Clara Nan-Hi Lee, Peter Anthony Ubel, Allison M Deal, Lillian Burdick Blizard, Karen R Sepucha, David W Ollila, Michael Patrick Pignone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors associated with the desire to undergo post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in a Mexican breast cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clara Nan-Hi Lee*Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC†Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC‡Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC§Department of Marketing, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC¶Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core Facility, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC||Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA**Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA††Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA‡‡Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Peter Anthony Ubel
Allison M Deal
Lillian Burdick Blizard
Karen R Sepucha
David W Ollila
Michael Patrick Pignone
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Patient Decision Making about Breast Reconstruction after MastectomyK07CA154850 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LEE, CLARA NAN-HI · 2011 to 2015
$859k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA154850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess how informed patients are about breast reconstruction, and how involved they are in decision making. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Breast reconstruction is an important treatment option for patients undergoing mastectomy. Wide variations in who gets reconstruction, however, have led to concerns about decision making.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients planning mastectomy at a single site, over 20 months. Before surgery, patients completed a survey with validated scales to assess knowledge about breast reconstruction and involvement in decision making. Factors associated with knowledge were examined in a multivariable linear regression model.

resultsA total of 145 patients enrolled (77% enrollment rate), and 126 remained eligible. The overall knowledge score was 58.5% (out of 100%). Knowledge about risk of complications was especially low at 14.3%. Knowledge did not differ by treatment (reconstruction or not). On multivariable analysis, non-white race was independently associated with lower knowledge. Most patients (92.1%) reported some discussion with a provider about reconstruction, and most (90.4%) reported being asked their preference. More patients reported discussing the advantages of reconstruction (57.9%) than the disadvantages (27.8%).

conclusionsWomen undergoing mastectomy in this sample were highly involved in decision making, but had major deficits in knowledge about the procedure. Knowledge about the risk of complications was particularly low. Providers seemed to have discussed the advantages of reconstruction more than its disadvantages.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMastectomyBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMammaplastyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26727092
PMCPMC5333694
OpenAlexW2223376037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.