Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26726916›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2016

Exploratory decision-making as a function of lifelong experience, not cognitive decline.

Nathaniel J Blanco, Bradley C Love, Michael Ramscar, A Ross Otto, Kirsten Smayda, W Todd Maddox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Lifespan Perspective on Embodied Cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathaniel J BlancoDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin.ORCID 0000-0001-9899-8048
Bradley C LoveDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London.
Michael RamscarDepartment of Linguistics, University of Tübingen.
A Ross OttoCenter for Neural Science, New York University.
Kirsten SmaydaDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin.
W Todd MaddoxDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin.

Funding

A computational neuroscience approach to frontal compensation in decision-makingR01AG043425 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SCHNYER, DAVID M, WORTHY, DARRELL A. · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS AG043425NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043425Wellcome Trust WT106931MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults perform worse than younger adults in some complex decision-making scenarios, which is commonly attributed to age-related declines in striatal and frontostriatal processing. Recently, this popular account has been challenged by work that considered how older adults' performance may differ as a function of greater knowledge and experience, and by work showing that, in some cases, older adults outperform younger adults in complex decision-making tasks. In light of this controversy, we examined the performance of older and younger adults in an exploratory choice task that is amenable to model-based analyses and ostensibly not reliant on prior knowledge. Exploration is a critical aspect of decision-making poorly understood across the life span. Across 2 experiments, we addressed (a) how older and younger adults differ in exploratory choice and (b) to what extent observed differences reflect processing capacity declines. Model-based analyses suggested that the strategies used by the 2 groups were qualitatively different, resulting in relatively worse performance for older adults in 1 decision-making environment but equal performance in another. Little evidence was found that differences in processing capacity drove performance differences. Rather the results suggested that older adults' performance might result from applying a strategy that may have been shaped by their wealth of real-word decision-making experience. While this strategy is likely to be effective in the real world, it is ill suited to some decision environments. These results underscore the importance of taking into account effects of experience in aging studies, even for tasks that do not obviously tap past experiences.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingChoice BehaviorDecision MakingExploratory BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26726916
PMCPMC4755819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.