Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26725547›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

How a moderated online discussion forum facilitates support for young people with eating disorders.

Sarah Kendal, Sue Kirk, Rebecca Elvey, Roger Catchpole, Steven Pryjmachuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Mapping Review of Netnography in Nursing.Qualitative health research · 2023
    Review
  11. Characteristics Associated with Young Adults' Intentions to Engage with Anti-Vaping Instagram Posts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah KendalSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8557-5716
Sue KirkSchool of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rebecca ElveyCentre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roger CatchpoleYoungMinds, London, UK.
Steven PryjmachukSchool of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/1008/30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYoung people with eating disorders are at risk of harm to their social, emotional and physical development and life chances. Although they can be reluctant to seek help, they may access social media for information, advice or support. The relationship between social media and youth well-being is an emotive subject, but not clearly understood. This qualitative study aimed to explore how young people used a youth-orientated, moderated, online, eating disorders discussion forum, run by an eating disorders charity.

methodsWe applied a netnographic approach involving downloading and thematically analysing over 400 messages posted August-November 2012.

resultsData analysis generated five themes: Taking on the role of mentor; the online discussion forum as a safe space; Friendship within the online forum; Flexible help; and Peer support for recovery and relapse prevention. Forum moderation may have influenced the forum culture. DISCUSSION: Our findings are consistent with literature about youth preferences for mental health self-care support. A young person's decision to use this discussion forum can be construed as pro-active self-care. A moderated online discussion forum can make a positive contribution to support for youth with eating disorders, countering negative media perceptions of online groups.

conclusionThis study adds to knowledge about how young people access support via social media. Online discussion forums can be safe and acceptable spaces for youth to access help. Further research could provide insights into the impact of forum moderation.

Indexed as

Social MediaSocial SupportAdolescentChildFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adulteating disordersmoderated online discussionnetnographyqualitativesocial mediayouth

Identifiers

PMID26725547
PMCPMC5217921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.