Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26725097›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Evaluation of chromosome 1q gain in intracranial ependymomas.

Madhu Rajeshwari, Mehar Chand Sharma, Aanchal Kakkar, Aruna Nambirajan, Vaishali Suri, Chitra Sarkar, Manmohan Singh, Ravindra Kumar Saran, Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madhu RajeshwariDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Mehar Chand SharmaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. sharmamehar@yahoo.co.in.
Aanchal KakkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Aruna NambirajanDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Vaishali SuriDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Manmohan SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Ravindra Kumar SaranDepartment of Pathology, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Rakesh Kumar GuptaDepartment of Pathology, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, 110002, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGovind Ballabh Pant Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ependymomas are relatively uncommon gliomas with poor prognosis despite recent advances in neurooncology. Molecular pathogenesis of ependymomas is not extensively studied. Lack of correlation of histological grade with patient outcome has directed attention towards identification of molecular alterations as novel prognostic markers. Recently, 1q gain has emerged as a potential prognostic marker, associated with decreased survival, especially in posterior fossa, high grade tumors. Cases of intracranial ependymomas were retrieved. Tumors were graded using objective criteria to supplement WHO grading. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for 1q gain was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections. Eighty-one intracranial ependymomas were analyzed. Pediatric (76%) and infratentorial (70%) ependymomas constituted the majority. 1q gain was seen in 27 cases (33%), was equally frequent in children (34%) and adults (32%), supratentorial (37%) and infratentorial (32%) location, grade II (33%) and III (25%) tumors. Recurrence was noted in 24 cases and death in 7 cases with 5-year progression-free and overall-survival rates of 37% and 80%, respectively. Grade II tumors had a better survival than grade III tumors; histopathological grade was the only prognostically significant marker. 1q gain had no prognostic significance. 1q gain is frequent in ependymomas in Indian patients, seen across all ages, sites and grades, and thus is likely an early event in pathogenesis. The prognostic value of 1q gain, remains uncertain, and multicentric pooling of data is required. A histopathological grading system using objective criteria correlates well with patient outcome and can serve as an economical option for prognostication of ependymomas.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChild, PreschoolChromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 1EpendymomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesInfratentorial NeoplasmsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, Tumor1q gainBrain tumorsEpendymomaFISHPediatricPosterior fossa

Identifiers

PMID26725097
OpenAlexW2226760327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.