Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26725071›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2016

Is steroids therapy effective in treating phimosis? A meta-analysis.

Jiaming Liu, Jin Yang, Yuntian Chen, Sihang Cheng, Chao Xia, Tuo Deng

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Primary care of preputial adhesions in children - a retrospective cohort study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaming LiuDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jin YangThe Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. dr.jinyang@163.com.
Yuntian ChenWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sihang ChengWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chao XiaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tuo DengWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sichuan University · CNChengdu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated a systematic review on the therapeutic efficacy of topical steroids in children with phimosis to provide data for the clinical options of pediatric phimosis.

methodsWe searched the related original studies on topical steroid therapy in pediatric phimosis before August 2014. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and reporting quality assessment with confirmation by cross-checking. The quality of eligible studies was appraised with the 'Cochrane handbook.' The meta-analysis was performed by REVMAN 5.2 software.

resultsEleven studies were included with 1669 patients among which 1093 received topical steroids and 576 cases treated with placebo or only manual reduction. Significant difference of the treatment efficacy was detected among the three methods [OR 7.46, 95 % CI (4.42, 12.58), p < 0.00001]. In subgroup analysis, significant difference of the treatment efficacy was also detected whether with placebo or manual reduction only [respectively, OR 5.04, 95 % CI (3.19, 7.95), p < 0.00001; OR 16.28, 95 % CI (6.06, 43.69), p < 0.00001].

conclusionsCompared to the placebo or manual reduction method, the topical steroid therapy is more effective in the treatment of phimosis in children. Although there is still controversy in the different type and dosage of steroid, this could be used against phimosis before circumcision.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalGlucocorticoidsHumansMalePhimosisTreatment OutcomeGlucocorticoidsMeta-analysisPediatric phimosisPhimosisTopical steroids

Identifiers

PMID26725071
OpenAlexW2237102007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.