Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26725064›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2016

Gut Microbiota and Celiac Disease.

Giovanni Marasco, Anna Rita Di Biase, Ramona Schiumerini, Leonardo Henry Eusebi, Lorenzo Iughetti, Federico Ravaioli, Eleonora Scaioli, Antonio Colecchia, Davide Festi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04655495 (Impact of a Low-FODMAP Gluten-free Diet on Gut Microbiota and Circulating miRNAs in Different Phenotypes of Celiac Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04655495 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Low-FODMAP Gluten-free Diet on Gut Microbiota and Circulating miRNAs in Different Phenotypes of Celiac Disease Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsCeliac DiseaseArmsLow FODMAPs /balanced gluten free diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of gut microbiota profile in celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diarrhea management: from pathophysiology to microbiota modulation.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Variations in gut microbiota in celiac disease patients: a systematic review.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Gut bacteria: an etiological agent in human pathological conditions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni MarascoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. giovannimarasco89@gmail.com.
Anna Rita Di BiaseDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Modena, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Ramona SchiumeriniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Leonardo Henry EusebiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo IughettiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Modena, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Federico RavaioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Eleonora ScaioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Antonio ColecchiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Davide FestiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence regarding celiac disease has increasingly shown the role of innate immunity in triggering the immune response by stimulating the adaptive immune response and by mucosal damage. The interaction between the gut microbiota and the mucosal wall is mediated by the same receptors which can activate innate immunity. Thus, changes in gut microbiota may lead to activation of this inflammatory pathway. This paper is a review of the current knowledge regarding the relationship between celiac disease and gut microbiota. In fact, patients with celiac disease have a reduction in beneficial species and an increase in those potentially pathogenic as compared to healthy subjects. This dysbiosis is reduced, but might still remain, after a gluten-free diet. Thus, gut microbiota could play a significant role in the pathogenesis of celiac disease, as described by studies which link dysbiosis with the inflammatory milieu in celiac patients. The use of probiotics seems to reduce the inflammatory response and restore a normal proportion of beneficial bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Additional evidence is needed in order to better understand the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of celiac disease, and the clinical impact and therapeutic use of probiotics in this setting.

Indexed as

BacteriaCeliac DiseaseGastrointestinal TractHumansInflammationCeliac diseaseDysbiosisGluten-free dietGut microbiotaProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID26725064
OpenAlexW2270925180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.