ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2016
Anatomical and histological study to determine the border of sole skin.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reference values for skin microanatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ex vivo studies.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2017Pooled it
- Characterization of the human ridged and non-ridged skin: a comprehensive histological, histochemical and immunohistochemical analysis.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTransfer of a free skin graft from the submalleolar or plantar instep area to the palmoplantar area and finger defects is widely performed; however, the sites and the border of plantar skin have yet to be examined in detail. The aim of this study was to determine the border of sole skin.
methodsTwelve paraformaldehyde-fixed cadavers were examined. Skin specimens were harvested from an area from the top of the medial malleolus extending to the top of the lateral malleolus of the right foot. The paraffin-embedded skin specimens were analyzed using histological (hematoxylin and eosin, Fontana-Masson, and elastica van Gieson stains) and immunohistochemical (cytokeratin 9) techniques.
resultsCK9-positive cells were present at the points between 21 and 78 % of the intermalleolar distance measured from the tops of the medial and lateral malleoli. The melanin index abruptly changed at the points 25 ± 7.1 and 75 ± 4.2 %. The skin thickness and amount of elastic fibers changed greatly at the points between 20 and 30 % and between 70 and 80 % of the intermalleolar distance.
conclusionsSubmalleolar skin is quite different from sole skin. The border of sole skin lies at the points between 20 and 25 % of the intermalleolar distance from the medial malleolus, which macroscopically corresponds to the border of skin maceration. It would be better to use the submalleolar area for grafts for the dorsum of the fingers or toes, and the plantar instep area for the ventral areas of the fingers or toes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.