Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26724756›Full record

ArticleHearing research2016

Cortical and thalamic connectivity of the auditory anterior ectosylvian cortex of early-deaf cats: Implications for neural mechanisms of crossmodal plasticity.

M Alex Meredith, H Ruth Clemo, Sarah B Corley, Nicole Chabot, Stephen G Lomber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Leveraging Nonhuman Primate Multisensory Neurons and Circuits in Assessing Consciousness Theory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Modified Origins of Cortical Projections to the Superior Colliculus in the Deaf: Dispersion of Auditory Efferents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is territorial expansion a mechanism for crossmodal plasticity?The European journal of neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Task-specific reorganization of the auditory cortex in deaf humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Alex MeredithVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. Electronic address: mameredi@vcu.edu.
H Ruth ClemoVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Sarah B CorleyVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Nicole ChabotCerebral Systems Laboratory, The Brain and Mind Institute, Natural Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Stephen G LomberCerebral Systems Laboratory, The Brain and Mind Institute, Natural Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.

Funding

CROSS-MODAL INTEGRATION AND PLASTICITY IN SOMATOSENSORYR01NS039460 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MEREDITH, M ALEX · 2000 to 2009
$2.8M
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNINDS NIH HHS NS-39460NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early hearing loss leads to crossmodal plasticity in regions of the cerebrum that are dominated by acoustical processing in hearing subjects. Until recently, little has been known of the connectional basis of this phenomenon. One region whose crossmodal properties are well-established is the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (FAES) in the cat, where neurons are normally responsive to acoustic stimulation and its deactivation leads to the behavioral loss of accurate orienting toward auditory stimuli. However, in early-deaf cats, visual responsiveness predominates in the FAES and its deactivation blocks accurate orienting behavior toward visual stimuli. For such crossmodal reorganization to occur, it has been presumed that novel inputs or increased projections from non-auditory cortical areas must be generated, or that existing non-auditory connections were 'unmasked.' These possibilities were tested using tracer injections into the FAES of adult cats deafened early in life (and hearing controls), followed by light microscopy to localize retrogradely labeled neurons. Surprisingly, the distribution of cortical and thalamic afferents to the FAES was very similar among early-deaf and hearing animals. No new visual projection sources were identified and visual cortical connections to the FAES were comparable in projection proportions. These results support an alternate theory for the connectional basis for cross-modal plasticity that involves enhanced local branching of existing projection terminals that originate in non-auditory as well as auditory cortices.

Indexed as

HearingNeuronal PlasticityAcoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAge FactorsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionCatsDisease Models, AnimalHearing LossKanamycinNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesPhotic StimulationThalamusKanamycinHearing lossSensory substitutionSomatosensory cortexThalamusVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID26724756
PMCPMC4798861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.