Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26724474›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2016

Adaptive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by (18)F-FDG PET in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers: The NEOSCAN Trial.

Jamie E Chaft, Mark Dunphy, Jarushka Naidoo, William D Travis, Matthew Hellmann, Kaitlin Woo, Robert Downey, Valerie Rusch, Michelle S Ginsberg, Christopher G Azzoli and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. FDG PET Hybrid Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie E ChaftDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Electronic address: chaftj@mskcc.org.
Mark DunphyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jarushka NaidooDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
William D TravisDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Matthew HellmannDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Kaitlin WooDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robert DowneyDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Valerie RuschDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michelle S GinsbergDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christopher G AzzoliDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark G KrisDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Biomarkers for predicting response to Hsp90 therapyR01CA172546 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHIOSIS, GABRIELA, DUNPHY, MARK P. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough perioperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resectable lung cancers, systemic recurrence remains common. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy permits response assessment and an opportunity to switch treatment regimens. Response measured by fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) correlates with clinical outcomes better than computed tomography (CT) does. This trial assessed PET-measured response rate to alternative chemotherapy in patients with a suboptimal PET response after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsThis phase II study enrolled patients with resectable stage IB-IIIA lung cancers (primary tumor ≥ 2 cm and peak standard uptake value [SUVpeak] ≥ 4.5). Patients had a pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan before two cycles of cisplatin (or carboplatin) plus gemcitabine (squamous cell carcinoma) or pemetrexed (adenocarcinoma) and then a repeat PET/CT scan. If SUVpeak in the primary tumor decreased by at least 35%, patients continued the initial chemotherapy. Individuals with less than a 35% PET response were switched to vinorelbine plus docetaxel. Postoperative radiotherapy was recommended to all patients with positive N2 nodes. A Simon's optimal two-stage design was used to evaluate the primary end point of a PET Response in Solid Tumors-defined response rate to vinorelbine plus docetaxel in previously nonresponding patients.

resultsForty patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients (38% [95% confidence interval: 38-53]) had less than a 35% decrease in SUVpeak, and 13 received vinorelbine plus docetaxel. The study met its primary end point with 10 of 15 PET metabolic responses to alternate therapy (67%). Chemotherapy toxicities never precluded surgical exploration.

conclusionsUtilizing (18)F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and change preoperative chemotherapy in nonresponding patients can improve radiographic measures of response. This adaptive approach can also be used to test new drugs, attempting to optimize perioperative chemotherapy to achieve better long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18(18)F-FDG PETAdaptive clinical trialNeoadjuvant therapyNon–small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID26724474
PMCPMC4808609
OpenAlexW2231617741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.