Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26723889›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today. Technologies2015

Profiling technologies for the identification and characterization of small-molecule histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Daiqing Liao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today. Technologies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Comparative Study of Target Engagement Assays for HDAC1 Inhibitor Profiling.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daiqing LiaoDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida College of Medicine, UF Health Cancer Center, UF Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL 32610-0235, United States. Electronic address: dliao@ufl.edu.
University of Florida Health · US

Funding

Deregulation of Cell Pathways by Ad E1B 55K OncoproteinsR01CA092236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LIAO, DAIQING · 2001 to 2005
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are promising drug targets for treating cancer, neurologic, inflammatory and metabolic diseases. Four small molecule inhibitors of HDACs have gained regulatory approval for treating lymphomas and multiple myelomas. Highly sensitive in vitro and cell-based profiling technologies have been developed to discover HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) and characterize their inhibitory potency, target-binding specificity and kinetics. In particular, proteomic profiling can define the specificity of an inhibitor at a single residue resolution. Chemoproteomic profiling can determine the potency, specificity and binding kinetics of an inhibitor on a specific HDAC complex in cell extracts. As inhibitors with new chemical scaffolds are of particular interest to improve HDAC isoform-specificity and pharmaceutical properties, effective profiling technologies will continue to have important utility. Here we briefly review recent developments of HDAC inhibitor profiling technologies and discuss distinct features of various technologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansIsomerismProtein BindingProteomicsSmall Molecule LibrariesTechnology, PharmaceuticalHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID26723889
PMCPMC4698312
OpenAlexW2198369501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.