ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2015
Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards gaining sight of multiscale events: utilizing network models and normal modes in hybrid methods.Current opinion in structural biology · 2020Review
- Characterizing and Predicting Protein Hinges for Mechanistic Insight.Journal of molecular biology · 2020Article
- Coarse-grain simulations on NMR conformational ensembles highlight functional residues in proteins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Large-Scale Conformational Changes and Protein Function: Breaking theFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Review
- Directional Force Originating from ATP Hydrolysis Drives the GroEL Conformational Change.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Molecular determinants of cadherin ideal bond formation: Conformation-dependent unbinding on a multidimensional landscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Prediction and validation of protein intermediate states from structurally rich ensembles and coarse-grained simulations.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting conformational changes of proteins is needed in order to fully comprehend functional mechanisms. With the large number of available structures in sets of related proteins, it is now possible to directly visualize the clusters of conformations and their conformational transitions through the use of principal component analysis. The most striking observation about the distributions of the structures along the principal components is their highly non-uniform distributions. In this work, we use principal component analysis of experimental structures of 50 diverse proteins to extract the most important directions of their motions, sample structures along these directions, and estimate their free energy landscapes by combining knowledge-based potentials and entropy computed from elastic network models. When these resulting motions are visualized upon their coarse-grained free energy landscapes, the basis for conformational pathways becomes readily apparent. Using three well-studied proteins, T4 lysozyme, serum albumin, and sarco-endoplasmic reticular Ca(2+) adenosine triphosphatase (SERCA), as examples, we show that such free energy landscapes of conformational changes provide meaningful insights into the functional dynamics and suggest transition pathways between different conformational states. As a further example, we also show that Monte Carlo simulations on the coarse-grained landscape of HIV-1 protease can directly yield pathways for force-driven conformational changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.