Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26723634›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2015

Are protein-protein interfaces special regions on a protein's surface?

Sam Tonddast-Navaei, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the functional impact of protein binding site definition.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cold spots are universal in protein-protein interactions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Foldamer hypothesis for the growth and sequence differentiation of prebiotic polymers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sam Tonddast-NavaeiCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 250 14th Street N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30318, USA.
Jeffrey SkolnickCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 250 14th Street N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30318, USA.

Funding

Purchase of a GPU cluster for deep learning applications in protein-protein interaction and supercomplex prediction and biochemical literature annotation.R35GM118039 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JEFFREY SKOLNICK · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
THEORY OF FOLDING TRANSITIONS IN A-HELICAL PROTEINSR01GM037408 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1987 to 2014
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-37408NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037408NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are involved in many cellular processes. Experimentally obtained protein quaternary structures provide the location of protein-protein interfaces, the surface region of a given protein that interacts with another. These regions are termed half-interfaces (HIs). Canonical HIs cover roughly one third of a protein's surface and were found to have more hydrophobic residues than the non-interface surface region. In addition, the classical view of protein HIs was that there are a few (if not one) HIs per protein that are structurally and chemically unique. However, on average, a given protein interacts with at least a dozen others. This raises the question of whether they use the same or other HIs. By copying HIs from monomers with the same folds in solved quaternary structures, we introduce the concept of geometric HIs (HIs whose geometry has a significant match to other known interfaces) and show that on average they cover three quarters of a protein's surface. We then demonstrate that in some cases, these geometric HI could result in real physical interactions (which may or may not be biologically relevant). The composition of the new HIs is on average more charged compared to most known ones, suggesting that the current protein interface database is biased towards more hydrophobic, possibly more obligate, complexes. Finally, our results provide evidence for interface fuzziness and PPI promiscuity. Thus, the classical view of unique, well defined HIs needs to be revisited as HIs are another example of coarse-graining that is used by nature.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsBinding SitesHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProteinsProtein Structure, QuaternarySurface PropertiesProteins

Identifiers

PMID26723634
PMCPMC4684567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.