Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26723182›Full record

ArticleUrology2016

Assessment of the Male Urethral Reconstruction Learning Curve.

Sarah F Faris, Jeremy B Myers, Bryan B Voelzke, Sean P Elliott, Benjamin N Breyer, Alex J Vanni, Christopher A Tam, Bradley A Erickson, Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons (TURNS)

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long term outcomes of one-stage augmentation anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The evolution of urethral stricture and urethroplasty practice over 15 years: A single-center, single-surgeon, 1319 urethroplasty analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Learning curve of various type of male urethroplasty.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty.Translational andrology and urology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah F FarisDepartment of Urology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Jeremy B MyersDivision of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Bryan B VoelzkeDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Sean P ElliottDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Benjamin N BreyerDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Alex J VanniDepartment of Urology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA.
Christopher A TamDepartment of Urology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Bradley A EricksonDepartment of Urology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Electronic address: brad-erickson@uiowa.edu.
Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons (TURNS)
University of Iowa · USLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

UCSF KURe Career Development ProgramK12DK083021 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASKIN, LAURENCE, CARROLL, PETER R · 2008 to 2017
$5.9M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROF. SCHOOLST35HL007485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROGHAIR, ROBERT D · 1985 to 2019
$4.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007485NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK083021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the urethroplasty learning curve. Published success rates of urethral reconstruction for urethral stricture disease are high even though these procedures can be technically demanding. It is likely that success rates improve with time although a learning curve for urethral reconstruction has never been established. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed anterior urethroplasties from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database. Success was analyzed at the 18-month mark in all patients and defined as freedom from secondary operation for stricture recurrence. A multivariate logistic regression was performed for outcomes vs time from fellowship and case number.

resultsA total of 613 consecutive cases from 6 surgeons were analyzed, with a functional success rate of 87.3%. The success rate for bulbar urethroplasties was higher than that for penile urethroplasties (88.2% vs 78.3%, P = .0116). The success rate of anastomotic repairs was higher than that for substitution repairs (95.0% vs 82.4%, P = .0001). There was a statistically significant trend toward improved outcomes with increasing number of cases (P = .0422), which was most pronounced with bulbar repairs. There was no statistical improvement in penile repairs over time. The case number to reach proficiency (>90% success) was approximately 100 cases for all types of reconstruction and 70 cases for bulbar urethroplasty. There were statistical differences in success rates among the participating surgeons (P = .0014). Complications decreased with time (P = .0053).

conclusionThis study shows that success rates of anterior urethral reconstruction improve significantly with surgeon experience. Proficiency occurs after approximately 100 cases.

Indexed as

Learning CurveHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUrethraUrethral StrictureUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male

Identifiers

PMID26723182
PMCPMC4792781
OpenAlexW2199109980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.