ArticleOncology letters2015
Serum miRNA expression in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering the role of microRNAs in esophageal cancer: from pathogenesis to clinical applications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Estimation of Serum MicroRNA 21 as a Tumour Marker in Carcinoma Oesophagus.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- miR-451: A Novel Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Review
- Circulating plasma microRNAs in the detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Epigenetic alterations of the Igf2 promoter and the effect of miR‑483‑5p on its target gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular medicine reports · 2018Article
- Identification of Serum MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Feature Selection Algorithms.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Circulating MicroRNAs for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- Unique circulating microRNAs in relation to EGFR mutation status in Japanese smoker male with lung adenocarcinoma.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- A six-microRNA signature in plasma was identified as a potential biomarker in diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Down-regulation of MiR-365 as a novel indicator to assess the progression and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017Article
- Serum microRNA-15a level acts as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and value of serum microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) as biological markers for the prediction of the behavior and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). The differential expression of serum miRNA was detected by an miRNA microarray of 9 patients with ESCC and 9 healthy volunteers. The result of the miRNA microarray was validated in serum samples of 69 patients with ESCC and 14 healthy volunteers by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The association between serum miRNA expression and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage was analyzed. A total of 10 serum-specific miRNAs were identified from the patients with ESCC. Through PCR verification, the expression levels of miR-129, miR-451 and miR-365 were consistent with the microarray results validated by RT-qPCR, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the healthy volunteers (P=0.007, P=0.007 and P<0.001, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that miR-365 could serve as potential diagnostic marker for ESCC; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.831, with a sensitivity of 80.56% and a specificity of 86.7%, but its expression did not differ significantly among the different TNM stages (stage I-II vs. III, P=0.052; stage III vs. IV, P=0.069). The expression level of miRNA-129 differed significantly among the different stages (stage I-II vs. III, P=0.002; stage III vs. IV, P=0.042), while the expression level of miR-451 did not differ significantly between stage III and IV (P=0.308). In conclusion, serum microRNAs are novel biomarkers for ESCC, and miRNA-365 and miRNA-129 can be used for the early prediction of cancer and the prediction of clinical stage, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.