Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26722205›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2015

Pancreatic Fistula and Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatectomy: Where do We Stand?

Ammar A Javed, Kanza Aziz, Fabio Bagante, Christopher L Wolfgang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ammar A JavedDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 685 Blalock, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA ; Center of Research Excellence and Surgical Trials, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 611 Blalock, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Kanza AzizDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 685 Blalock, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Fabio BaganteDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 685 Blalock, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 685 Blalock, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic resection has become a feasible treatment of pancreatic neoplasms, and with improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management, mortality associated with pancreatic surgery has decreased considerably. Despite this improvement, a high rate of complications is still associated with these procedures. Among these complications, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) have a substantial impact on patient outcomes and burden our healthcare system. Technical modifications and postoperative approaches have been proposed to reduce rates of both POPF and DGE in patients undergoing pancreatectomy; however, to date, their rates have remained unchanged. In the present study, we summarize the findings of the most significant studies that have investigated these complications. In particular, several studies focused on technical modifications including extent of dissection, stent placement, nature of anastomosis, type of reconstruction, and application of biological or non-biological agents to site of anastomosis. Moreover, postoperatively, drain placement, duration of drain usage, postoperative feeding, and use of pharmacological agents were studied to reduce rates of POPF and DGE. In this review, we summarize the most relevant literature on this fundamental aspect of pancreatic surgery. Despite studies identifying the potential benefit of technical modifications and postoperative approaches, these findings remain controversial and suggest need for further extensive investigation. Most importantly, we recommend that all surgeons performing these procedures base their practice on the most updated and highest available level of evidence.

Indexed as

ComplicationsDelayed gastric emptyingPancreatic surgeryPostoperative outcomesPostoperative pancreatic fistula

Identifiers

PMID26722205
PMCPMC4689708
OpenAlexW2187991059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.