Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26721928›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing2015

Reducing Current Spread by Use of a Novel Pulse Shape for Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve.

Jimena Ballestero, Matthieu Recugnat, Jonathan Laudanski, Katie E Smith, Daniel J Jagger, Daniel Gnansia, David McAlpine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jimena BallesteroEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Matthieu RecugnatEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Jonathan LaudanskiOticon Medical, Vallauris, France.
Katie E SmithEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Daniel J JaggerEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Daniel GnansiaOticon Medical, Vallauris, France.
David McAlpineEar Institute, University College London, London, UK david.mcalpine@mq.edu.au.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the electrode-neuron interface to reduce current spread between individual electrodes has been identified as one of the main objectives in the search for future improvements in cochlear-implant performance. Here, we address this problem by presenting a novel stimulation strategy that takes account of the biophysical properties of the auditory neurons (spiral ganglion neurons, SGNs) stimulated in electrical hearing. This new strategy employs a ramped pulse shape, where the maximum amplitude is achieved through a linear slope in the injected current. We present the theoretical framework that supports this new strategy and that suggests it will improve the modulation of SGNs' activity by exploiting their sensitivity to the rising slope of current pulses. The theoretical consequence of this sensitivity to the slope is a reduction in the spread of excitation within the cochlea and, consequently, an increase in the neural dynamic range. To explore the impact of the novel stimulation method on neural activity, we performed in vitro recordings of SGNs in culture. We show that the stimulus efficacy required to evoke action potentials in SGNs falls as the stimulus slope decreases. This work lays the foundation for a novel, and more biomimetic, stimulation strategy with considerable potential for implementation in cochlear-implant technology.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsCells, CulturedCochlear NerveElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalPotassium ChannelsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpiral GanglionUnited KingdomPotassium Channelsauditory nervecochlear implantelectric stimulationpotassium channelsspiral ganglion neurons

Identifiers

PMID26721928
PMCPMC4771040
OpenAlexW2207345003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.