ArticleCurrent microbiology2016
Novel Development of a qPCR Assay Based on the rpoB Gene for Rapid Detection of Cronobacter spp.
Article in Current microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DecipheringMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Development and Application of a Species-Specific PCR Assay for the Detection of the Emerging Food-Borne Pathogen Cronobacter Sakazakii.Current microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel real-time PCR (qPCR) assay with internal amplification control based on the rpoB gene was developed for the detection and quantification of Cronobacter spp. Inclusivity and exclusivity of the qPCR assay were tested on a strain collection containing 19 Cronobacter and 26 non-Cronobacter strains. All Cronobacter strains were successfully identified, whereas no cross-reactivity was observed with non-Cronobacter strains. The sensitivity of the qPCR assay for pure culture and powdered infant formula (PIF) without enrichment was 3.44 log CFU/ml(g) (2.74 × 10(3) CFU/ml(g)). When the qPCR assay was applied to artificially contaminated PIF after a 12-h enrichment step, as few as 0.03 log CFU/ml (1.06 × 10(0) CFU/ml) of C. sakazakii could be detected. The limit of detection of the qPCR assay was not reduced by the presence of 8 log CFU/ml of Salmonella Enteritidis in PIF. A total of 70 food samples were analyzed for the presence of Cronobacter spp., out of which 3 dry cereal products, 5 maternal milk, and 1 infant food formula were found as positive by qPCR. The results obtained by qPCR were consistent with those obtained by culture-based method. Results from this study demonstrate that the qPCR assay is a rapid, specific, and accurate method suitable for Cronobacter detection in foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26721831What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.