Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26721771›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Diagnostic Value of Prenatal MR Imaging in the Detection of Brain Malformations in Fetuses before the 26th Week of Gestational Age.

G Conte, C Parazzini, G Falanga, C Cesaretti, G Izzo, M Rustico, A Righini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Toward structured fellowships in fetal neuroimaging.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Brain fetal neuroradiology: a beginner's guide.Translational pediatrics · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G ConteFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neuroradiology (G.C., C.P., C.C., G.I., A.R.) Department of Health Sciences (G.C.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy giorgioconte.unimed@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1562-7389
C ParazziniFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neuroradiology (G.C., C.P., C.C., G.I., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0003-0364-8673
G FalangaDepartment of Biopathology and Medical and Forensic Biotechnologies (G.F.), Section of Radiological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-7906
C CesarettiFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neuroradiology (G.C., C.P., C.C., G.I., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-6819-0846
G IzzoFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neuroradiology (G.C., C.P., C.C., G.I., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-6407-7950
M RusticoGynecology and Obstetrics (M.R.), Children's Hospital Vittore Buzzi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-5081
A RighiniFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neuroradiology (G.C., C.P., C.C., G.I., A.R.).ORCID 0000-0003-3396-7413
Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn several countries, laws and regulations allow abortion for medical reasons within 24-25 weeks of gestational age. We investigated the diagnostic value of prenatal MR imaging for brain malformations within 25 weeks of gestational age. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively included fetuses within 25 weeks of gestational age who had undergone both prenatal and postnatal MR imaging of the brain between 2002 and 2014. Two senior pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated prenatal MR imaging examinations blinded to postnatal MR imaging findings. With postnatal MR imaging used as the reference standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the prenatal MR imaging in detecting brain malformations.

resultsOne-hundred nine fetuses (median gestational age at prenatal MR imaging: 22 weeks; range, 21-25 weeks) were included in this study. According to the reference standard, 111 malformations were detected. Prenatal MR imaging failed to detect correctly 11 of the 111 malformations: 3 midline malformations, 5 disorders of cortical development, 2 posterior fossa anomalies, and 1 vascular malformation. Prenatal MR imaging misdiagnosed 3 findings as pathologic in the posterior fossa.

conclusionsThe diagnostic value of prenatal MR imaging between 21 and 25 weeks' gestational age is very high, with limitations of sensitivity regarding the detection of disorders of cortical development.

Indexed as

BrainFemaleFetusGestational AgeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26721771
PMCPMC7960315
OpenAlexW2298100802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.