Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26721240›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Adverse event grading following CTCAE v3.0 underestimates hypertensive side effects in patients with glioma treated with Bevacizumab.

Elisabeth Bumes, Sarah Rzonsa, Markus Hutterer, Martin Proescholdt, Ulrich Bogdahn, Markus J Riemenschneider, Martin Uhl, Christina Wendl, Peter Hau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth BumesDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University of Regensburg Medical School, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Sarah RzonsaDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University of Regensburg Medical School, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus HuttererDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University of Regensburg Medical School, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin ProescholdtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Ulrich BogdahnDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University of Regensburg Medical School, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus J RiemenschneiderDepartment of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin UhlDepartment of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Christina WendlDepartment of Radiology, Regensburg University Hospital, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter HauDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University of Regensburg Medical School, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. peter.hau@ukr.de.
University of Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-VEGF therapy with Bevacizumab (BEV) is widely used in cases of relapsed high-grade glioma (HGG). Arterial hypertension is a known side effect of anti-VEGF therapy. 42 Patients with relapsed HGG were treated with BEV 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of 28-day cycles in addition to treatment with 40 mg TMZ daily until disease progression, based on magnetic resonance imaging and/or worsening of clinical status. In a retrospective analysis, hypertensive side effects were evaluated as the primary endpoint, while survival information in addition to toxicity was analyzed as secondary endpoint. Grading which employs the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 detected hypertensive events with a significantly higher sensitivity than CTCAE version 3.0. The rate of severe hypertensive events observed as CTCAE ≥ °3 were 9.5 % in version 3.0 and 45.2 % in version 4.0. The results presented here indicate that CTCAE version 3.0 may underreport the incidence and grade of BEV-induced hypertension within clinical trials. As hypertension has not only long-term, but also severe short-term side effects, we suggest that arterial hypertension under BEV should be scored according to CTCAE version 4.0 to avoid clinically relevant hypertension-related adverse events in these patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBevacizumabCTCAEGlioblastomaHigh-grade gliomaHypertensionTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID26721240
OpenAlexW2225638675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.