Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26720728›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2016

Inherited Mutations in Women With Ovarian Carcinoma.

Barbara M Norquist, Maria I Harrell, Mark F Brady, Tom Walsh, Ming K Lee, Suleyman Gulsuner, Sarah S Bernards, Silvia Casadei, Qian Yi, Robert A Burger and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 406 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
406citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
41.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

406 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 752 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Refine Risk and Outcomes in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in Australia.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. HRDetect in Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma: Stratification and Therapeutic Implications.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

346 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara M NorquistDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Maria I HarrellDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Mark F BradyThe NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Center Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Tom WalshDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle4Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ming K LeeDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle4Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Suleyman GulsunerDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle4Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Sarah S BernardsDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Silvia CasadeiDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle4Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Qian YiDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Robert A BurgerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
John K ChanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Sutter Health California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Susan A DavidsonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver.
Robert S MannelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City.
Paul A DiSilvestroDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Heather A LankesThe NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Center Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Nilsa C RamirezDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Mary Claire KingDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle4Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Elizabeth M SwisherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle3Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Michael J BirrerMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
University of Washington · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USProvidence College · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Elaina Harper · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Comprehensive Sequencing and Analysis of Variation in NHLBI CohortsUC2HL102925 · NHLBI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ALTSHULER, DAVID, GABRIEL, STACEY · 2010 to 2010
$14.7M
Northwest Genomics CenterUC2HL102926 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, PHILIP P, NICKERSON, DEBORAH A · 2010 to 2010
$14.0M
Northwest Genomics CenterRC2HL102926 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, PHILIP P, NICKERSON, DEBORAH A · 2009 to 2009
$11.0M
Comprehensive Sequencing and Analysis of Variation in NHLBI CohortsRC2HL102925 · NHLBI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ALTSHULER, DAVID, GABRIEL, STACEY · 2009 to 2009
$10.2M
WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENTK12HD001264 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Barbara Ann Goff · 1998 to 2026
$8.6M
Gynecologic Oncology Group Specimen BankingU24CA114793 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 2005 to 2014
$7.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1 U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS L30 CA179780NCI NIH HHS P20 CA097943NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS P50CA083636NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131965NCI NIH HHS R01CA131965NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142832NCI NIH HHS R01CA142834NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157744NCI NIH HHS R01CA157744NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175716NCI NIH HHS R01CA175716NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197458NCI NIH HHS RC4 CA156551NCI NIH HHS RC4CA156551NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA27469NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114793NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102923NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102924NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102925NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102926NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL103010NHLBI NIH HHS UC2 HL102923NHLBI NIH HHS UC2 HL102924NHLBI NIH HHS UC2 HL102925NHLBI NIH HHS UC2 HL102926NHLBI NIH HHS UC2 HL103010NICHD NIH HHS 5K12HD001264-13NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceGermline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are relatively common in women with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma (OC) causing a greatly increased lifetime risk of these cancers, but the frequency and relevance of inherited mutations in other genes is less well characterized.

objectiveTo determine the frequency and importance of germline mutations in cancer-associated genes in OC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA study population of 1915 woman with OC and available germline DNA were identified from the University of Washington (UW) gynecologic tissue bank (n = 570) and from Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) phase III clinical trials 218 (n = 788) and 262 (n = 557). Patients were enrolled at diagnosis and were not selected for age or family history. Germline DNA was sequenced from women with OC using a targeted capture and multiplex sequencing assay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mutation frequencies in OC were compared with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) and the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Clinical characteristics and survival were assessed by mutation status.

resultsOverall, the median (range) age at diagnosis was 60 (28-91) years in patients recruited from UW and 61 (23-87) years in patients recruited from the GOG trials. A higher number of black women were recruited from the GOG trials (4.3% vs 1.4%; P = .009); but in patients recruited from UW, there was a higher proportion of fallopian tube carcinomas (13.3% vs 5.7%; P < .001); stage I and II disease (14.6% vs 0% [GOG trials were restricted to advanced-stage cancer]); and nonserous carcinomas (29.9% vs 13.1%, P < .001). Of 1915 patients, 280 (15%) had mutations in BRCA1 (n = 182), or BRCA2 (n = 98), and 8 (0.4%) had mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Mutations in BRIP1 (n = 26), RAD51C (n = 11), RAD51D (n = 11), PALB2 (n = 12), and BARD1 (n = 4) were significantly more common in patients with OC than in the ESP or ExAC, present in 3.3%. Race, histologic subtype, and disease site were not predictive of mutation frequency. Patients with a BRCA2 mutation from the GOG trials had longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.79; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.60; P < .001) compared with those without mutations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Of 1915 patients with OC, 347 (18%) carried pathogenic germline mutations in genes associated with OC risk. PALB2 and BARD1 are suspected OC genes and together with established OC genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, MSH2, MLH1, PMS2, and MSH6) bring the total number of genes suspected to cause hereditary OC to 11.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID26720728
PMCPMC4845939
OpenAlexW2224210111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.