Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26720510›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2015

Residence Conditions on Community Treatment Orders.

John Dawson, Richard O'Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Community Treatment Orders and Other Forms of Mandatory Outpatient Treatment.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John DawsonProfessor, Faculty of Law, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Richard O'ReillyPsychiatrist and Professor, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the clinical reasons and legal authority for including a residential placement condition in a community treatment order (CTO).

methodWe describe the clinical reasons for imposing a residence condition and discuss how this is authorized by the laws of the Canadian provinces (using Ontario as the main example).

resultsA residence condition can facilitate numerous benefits, including: regular access to a person by a clinical team; continuing therapeutic relations; supervision of medication; provision of general medical care; and reduction in substance use, risks of victimization, and other unintended harm. A resident condition can be lawfully imposed when it clearly fits the purposes of the CTO legislation and stops short of authorizing detention in a community facility.

conclusionsIn certain circumstances, a residence condition is clinically justified and a lawful aspect of a CTO.

Indexed as

CanadaCommitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersCommunity Mental Health ServicesHousingHumansMental DisordersOntarioResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID26720510
PMCPMC4679133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.