Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26720401›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2016

Advances in Quantification of Meniscus Tensile Mechanics Including Nonlinearity, Yield, and Failure.

John M Peloquin, Michael H Santare, Dawn M Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Collagen-Based Scaffolds for Meniscal Repair and Regeneration.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multi-Scale Loading and Damage Mechanisms of Plantaris and Rat Tail Tendons.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John M Peloquin
Michael H Santare
Dawn M Elliott

Funding

Disc Mechanics and Altered Loading in DegenerationR01AR050052 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIOTT, DAWN M · 2005 to 2024
$4.7M
Multi-scale biomechanics of engineered and native fibrous load-bearing tissueR01EB002425 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIOTT, DAWN M, MAUCK, ROBERT L · 2003 to 2017
$4.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050052NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR050052NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002425NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB002425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The meniscus provides crucial knee function and damage to it leads to osteoarthritis of the articular cartilage. Accurate measurement of its mechanical properties is therefore important, but there is uncertainty about how the test procedure affects the results, and some key mechanical properties are reported using ad hoc criteria (modulus) or not reported at all (yield). This study quantifies the meniscus' stress-strain curve in circumferential and radial uniaxial tension. A fiber recruitment model was used to represent the toe region of the stress-strain curve, and new reproducible and objective procedures were implemented for identifying the yield point and measuring the elastic modulus. Patterns of strain heterogeneity were identified using strain field measurements. To resolve uncertainty regarding whether rupture location (i.e., midsubstance rupture versus at-grip rupture) influences the measured mechanical properties, types of rupture were classified in detail and compared. Dogbone (DB)-shaped specimens are often used to promote midsubstance rupture; to determine if this is effective, we compared DB and rectangle (R) specimens in both the radial and circumferential directions. In circumferential testing, we also compared expanded tab (ET) specimens under the hypothesis that this shape would more effectively secure the meniscus' curved fibers and thus produce a stiffer response. The fiber recruitment model produced excellent fits to the data. Full fiber recruitment occurred approximately at the yield point, strongly supporting the model's physical interpretation. The strain fields, especially shear and transverse strain, were extremely heterogeneous. The shear strain field was arranged in pronounced bands of alternating positive and negative strain in a pattern similar to the fascicle structure. The site and extent of failure showed great variation, but did not affect the measured mechanical properties. In circumferential tension, ET specimens underwent earlier and more rapid fiber recruitment, had less stretch at yield, and had greater elastic modulus and peak stress. No significant differences were observed between R and DB specimens in either circumferential or radial tension. Based on these results, ET specimens are recommended for circumferential tests and R specimens for radial tests. In addition to the data obtained, the procedural and modeling advances made in this study are a significant step forward for meniscus research and are applicable to other fibrous soft tissues.

Indexed as

Materials TestingMenisci, TibialNonlinear DynamicsTensile StrengthAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID26720401
PMCPMC4844065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.