Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26720152›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Origins of De Novo Genes in Human and Chimpanzee.

Jorge Ruiz-Orera, Jessica Hernandez-Rodriguez, Cristina Chiva, Eduard Sabidó, Ivanela Kondova, Ronald Bontrop, Tomàs Marqués-Bonet, M Mar Albà

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The hidden players: LncRNA-Encoded micropeptides in cancer hallmarks.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. De Novo Genes: Current Status and Future Goals.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The translatome of glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jorge Ruiz-OreraEvolutionary Genomics Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Jessica Hernandez-RodriguezDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina ChivaProteomics Unit, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Eduard SabidóProteomics Unit, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Ivanela KondovaBiomedical Primate Research Center (BPRC), Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Ronald BontropBiomedical Primate Research Center (BPRC), Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Tomàs Marqués-BonetDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
M Mar AlbàEvolutionary Genomics Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The birth of new genes is an important motor of evolutionary innovation. Whereas many new genes arise by gene duplication, others originate at genomic regions that did not contain any genes or gene copies. Some of these newly expressed genes may acquire coding or non-coding functions and be preserved by natural selection. However, it is yet unclear which is the prevalence and underlying mechanisms of de novo gene emergence. In order to obtain a comprehensive view of this process, we have performed in-depth sequencing of the transcriptomes of four mammalian species--human, chimpanzee, macaque, and mouse--and subsequently compared the assembled transcripts and the corresponding syntenic genomic regions. This has resulted in the identification of over five thousand new multiexonic transcriptional events in human and/or chimpanzee that are not observed in the rest of species. Using comparative genomics, we show that the expression of these transcripts is associated with the gain of regulatory motifs upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) and of U1 snRNP sites downstream of the TSS. In general, these transcripts show little evidence of purifying selection, suggesting that many of them are not functional. However, we find signatures of selection in a subset of de novo genes which have evidence of protein translation. Taken together, the data support a model in which frequently-occurring new transcriptional events in the genome provide the raw material for the evolution of new proteins.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenesGenome, HumanAnimalsBase SequenceFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMacacaMaleMicePan troglodytesPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRibonucleoprotein, U1 Small NuclearTestisRibonucleoprotein, U1 Small Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID26720152
PMCPMC4697840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.