Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719946›Full record

Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2016

Effects of palatal crib and bonded spurs in early treatment of anterior open bite: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Juliana S Leite, Luciano B Matiussi, Anne C Salem, Maria G A Provenzano, Adilson L Ramos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05313399 (Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs in Early Treatment of Anterior Open Bite Caused by Non-nutritive Sucking Habits), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05313399 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs in Early Treatment of Anterior Open Bite Caused by Non-nutritive Sucking Habits: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorReem Hatem ShamsRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsAnterior Open BiteArmsPalatal Crib, bonded spur
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana S Leitea  Postgraduate student, Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Luciano B Matiussib  Private practice, Ubiratã, Brazil.
Anne C Salemc  Private practice, Maringá, Brazil.
Maria G A Provenzanod  Adjunct Professor, Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Adilson L Ramose  Associate Professor, Departament of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the overbite correction of fixed palatal crib (FPC) and bonded lingual spur (BLS) in the early treatment of anterior open bite (AOB) in mixed dentition (primary outcome) as well as its influence on dental and skeletal cephalometric measurements (secondary outcome). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe selected patients had AOB and a mean age of 8.23 years. They were divided into the following three groups by casting lots: control (n  =  13), palatal crib (n  =  13), and spur (n  =  13). Data from the lateral teleradiography was obtained at the beginning, at 6 months, and after 1 year. The cephalometric analysis was performed by Cef-X program, recording the values of SNA, SNB, ANB, SnG oGn, 1.PP, IMPA, nasolabial angle, overbite, and overjet. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were obtained via one-way analysis of variance.

resultsThe degree of AOB was similar at baseline (P > .05). At 6 months and then after 1 year all groups showed improvement in the overbite. However, only the crib and spur groups showed positive overbite. No cephalometric measurements changed significantly over the period analyzed.

conclusionsWe conclude that the FPC and BLS are simple and effective for the treatment of anterior open bite, with the advantage given to the FPC.

Indexed as

Orthodontic AppliancesCephalometryChildFemaleHumansMaleOpen BitePalateProspective StudiesOpen biteOrthodontic appliances

Identifiers

PMID26719946
PMCPMC8600830
OpenAlexW2206302704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.