Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719783›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2015

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens in Northern area of Jordan.

Mazhar Salim Al-Zoubi, Ibrahim Ali Al-Tayyar, Emad Hussein, Alla Al Jabali, Salih Khudairat

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ceftaroline Exhibits PromisingInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftriaxone andAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of methicillin-resistantJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Methicillin- and Inducible Clindamycin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mazhar Salim Al-ZoubiBiology Deparrment, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan. ; Molecular Pathology Department, University of Pisa, Italy.
Ibrahim Ali Al-TayyarDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Brack, Sebha University, Lybia.
Emad HusseinBiology Deparrment, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Alla Al JabaliBiology Deparrment, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Salih KhudairatHussain Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Yarmouk University · JOKing Hussein Cancer Center · JOSebha University · LY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe global spread of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) constitutes one of the most serious contemporary challenges to the treatment of hospital-acquired infections. We aimed to screen and assess the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens in local hospitals of Northern province in Jordan. MATERIALS AND

methodsStaphylococcus aureus was isolated and identified using standard methods from various clinical specimens of different infected body sites from 358 patients during the period from January 2008 to November 2012.

resultsOur analysis showed that 31.6% of S. aureus infections were MRSA, while 31% were multidrug resistance (MDR) and 42.7% were Oxacillin-resistant (ORSA). Most of these strains were isolated from wound specimens. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (100%). They were also susceptible to chloramphenicol, linezolid, nitrofurantoin, rifampicin and teicoplanin (>80%), but showed resistance to erythromycin and penicillin.

conclusionVancomycin was the most effective antimicrobial agent against S. aureus. We recommend regular surveillance of hospital associated infections and monitoring antibiotic sensitivity pattern and strict drug policy for antibiotics used within and outside the hospital environments.

Indexed as

MDRMRSAStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID26719783
PMCPMC4695508
OpenAlexW2189763847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.