Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719641›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2015

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing with Etest for Candida Species Isolated from Patients with Oral Candidiasis.

You Bum Song, Moo Kyu Suh, Gyoung Yim Ha, Heesoo Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antifungal Susceptibility of ClinicalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review of the Anti-Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Uncommon Non-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. E-test Determination of Antifungal Susceptibility ofJournal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  17. [A clinical study of fungal esophagitis in 13 patients with hematologic malignancies].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

You Bum SongDepartment of Dermatology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.
Moo Kyu SuhDepartment of Dermatology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.
Gyoung Yim HaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.
Heesoo KimDepartment of Microbiology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.
Dongguk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe necessity of performing antifungal susceptibility tests is recently increasing because of frequent cases of oral candidiasis caused by antifungal-resistant Candida species. The Etest (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) is a rapid and easy-to-perform in vitro antifungal susceptibility test.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungal agents by using the Etest for Candida species isolated from patients with oral candidiasis.

methodsForty-seven clinical isolates of Candida species (39 isolates of Candida albicans, 5 isolates of C. glabrata, and 3 isolates of C. tropicalis) were tested along with a reference strain (C. albicans ATCC 90028). The MIC end points of the Etest for fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B susceptibility were read after the 24-hour incubation of each isolate on RPMI 1640 agar.

resultsAll Candida isolates were found susceptible to voriconazole and amphotericin B. However, all five isolates of C. glabrata were resistant to itraconazole, among which two isolates were also resistant to fluconazole.

conclusionThis study revealed that the Etest represented a simple and efficacious method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species isolated from oral candidiasis patients. Therefore, voriconazole and amphotericin B should be recommended as effective alternatives for the treatment of oral candidiasis.

Indexed as

CandidaEtestOral candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID26719641
PMCPMC4695424
OpenAlexW2284331280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.