Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719619›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2015

Survival analysis and functional outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement up to 11 years follow up at a District General Hospital.

M Edmondson, A Atrey, D East, N Ellens, K Miles, R Goddard, H Apthorp, A Butler-Manuel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M EdmondsonConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
A AtreyConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
D EastConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
N EllensConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
K MilesConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
R GoddardConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
H ApthorpConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.
A Butler-ManuelConquest Hospital, East Sussex TN37 7RD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been several large originator studies reporting excellent results with this prosthesis but far fewer large independent studies. We present, to our knowledge, the largest independent series documenting excellent survivorship rates and good functional outcomes at a mean follow up of 5.5 years post implantation of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

methodsOur prospective study looks at the survivorship and the functional outcome of 364 Oxford UKRs performed in a district general hospital at a mean follow up of 5.5 years (range 5-11 years). Post operatively knees were assessed in a research clinic using the Oxford knees score (as well as the American Knee Society Score and the Hospital for Special Surgery Score). Maximal flexion was also measured.

resultsThere were 26 revisions of 364 knees giving a survivorship, with revision as the end point, of 93% at a mean of 5.5 years post op (range 5-11 years). We achieved an Oxford score of 37.5, a mean AKSS of 161 (divided as American knee functional score 75.75/American knee objective score 85.4 (excellent)). The mean HSS score was 84.5. We achieved 'Excellent' Oxford knee scores in 137 knees (48%), 'Good' in 75 (26%), 'Moderate' in 51 (17%) and 'Poor' in only 27 (9%) of knees. Mean improvement in functional scores were: Oxford score (14.4), AKSS (71) and HSS (26.3). Mean maximal flexion was 123° range (110-140).

conclusionsWe have confirmed that good medium to long-term function and survival can be obtained following Oxford medial knee replacement for treating anteromedial osteoarthritis, in our large independent series.

Indexed as

Functional outcomeOxford unicompartmental kneeSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26719619
PMCPMC4674499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.