Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719596›Full record

ReviewGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2015

The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

W Rath, S Kehl

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06053073 (Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital to Improve the Vaginal Delivery Rate, Maternal Satisfaction and Reduce Costs), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06053073 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital to Improve the Vaginal Delivery Rate, Maternal Satisfaction and Reduce Costs: Multicentric Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2023 to 2026Enrolled834ConditionsInduced, Birth, Cervical Dilatation, Live BirthArmsCervical rippening at home, Cervical rippening in the hospital
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extended balloon labour induction: A single arm proof of concept trial.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W RathFaculty of Medicine, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen.
S KehlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen.
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to rising rates of labour induction in industrialised countries, safe and effective methods of induction have once again become a focus of interest and research. Prostaglandins are effective for cervical ripening and induction of uterine contractions. They do, however, cause overstimulation of the uterus in up to 20 % of cases, sometimes causing changes in fetal heart rate. Transcervical balloon catheters provide an alternative to prostaglandins for labour induction and have been used for this purpose for almost 50 years. This induction method has experienced a recent renaissance in clinical practice that is reflected in an annually rising number of publications on its use. Balloon catheters allow gentle ripening of the cervix without causing uterine overstimulation. The two catheters available are the Foley catheter (off-label use) and the double balloon catheter, which is licensed for use in induction of labour. Both are as effective as prostaglandins, and do not increase the risk of infection to mother or child. Catheter induction also requires less monitoring compared to prostaglandins resulting in improved patient satisfaction. Balloon catheters provide a useful and promising option to achieve vaginal delivery despite failed prostaglandin induction. Intravenous oxytocin is nevertheless required in up to 85 % of cases for adequate induction/augmentation of contractions. Balloon catheters, vaginal PGE

Indexed as

balloon cathetereffectivenesslabour inductionprostaglandinssafety

Identifiers

PMID26719596
PMCPMC4678052
OpenAlexW2198340644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.