Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719526›Full record

ArticleCancer research2016

Spatial Modeling of Drug Delivery Routes for Treatment of Disseminated Ovarian Cancer.

Kimberly Kanigel Winner, Mara P Steinkamp, Rebecca J Lee, Maciej Swat, Carolyn Y Muller, Melanie E Moses, Yi Jiang, Bridget S Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly Kanigel Winner *Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Mara P Steinkamp *Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Rebecca J LeeCancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Maciej SwatDepartment of Physics and Institute of Biocomplexity, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA.
Carolyn Y MullerDepartment of OB/GYN, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Melanie E MosesDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Yi JiangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA USA.
Bridget S WilsonDepartment of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
University of New Mexico · USGeorgia State University · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
UNM TRAININGP50GM085273 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI EDWARDS, JEREMY S · 2009 to 2018
$26.1M
Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
Multiscale Modeling of ECM-tumor interactions in Breast CancerU01CA143069 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, YI, KEELY, PATRICIA J · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
MSM Mapping and Modeling ErbB Receptor Membrane Topogra*R01CA119232 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WILSON, BRIDGET S · 2005 to 2012
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA143069NCI NIH HHS CA119232NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119232NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143069NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085273NLM NIH HHS 2T15-LM009451NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451PHS HHS EF-1038682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ovarian cancer, metastasis is typically confined to the peritoneum. Surgical removal of the primary tumor and macroscopic secondary tumors is a common practice, but more effective strategies are needed to target microscopic spheroids persisting in the peritoneal fluid after debulking surgery. To treat this residual disease, therapeutic agents can be administered by either intravenous or intraperitoneal infusion. Here, we describe the use of a cellular Potts model to compare tumor penetration of two classes of drugs (cisplatin and pertuzumab) when delivered by these two alternative routes. The model considers the primary route when the drug is administered either intravenously or intraperitoneally, as well as the subsequent exchange into the other delivery volume as a secondary route. By accounting for these dynamics, the model revealed that intraperitoneal infusion is the markedly superior route for delivery of both small-molecule and antibody therapies into microscopic, avascular tumors typical of patients with ascites. Small tumors attached to peritoneal organs, with vascularity ranging from 2% to 10%, also show enhanced drug delivery via the intraperitoneal route, even though tumor vessels can act as sinks during the dissemination of small molecules. Furthermore, we assessed the ability of the antibody to enter the tumor by in silico and in vivo methods and suggest that optimization of antibody delivery is an important criterion underlying the efficacy of these and other biologics. The use of both delivery routes may provide the best total coverage of tumors, depending on their size and vascularity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeModels, TheoreticalOvarian NeoplasmsSmall Molecule LibrariesAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID26719526
PMCPMC4794352
OpenAlexW2279401909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.