Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719483›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP.

Janica Chavda, Anika Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social Media Impact of Myopia Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. The Fertility of a Concept: A Bibliometric Review of Human Flourishing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article-Level Metrics.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021
    Review
  6. Scholarly Publishing in the Wake of COVID-19.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Getting the Word Out: New Approaches for Disseminating Public Health Science.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janica ChavdaDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.
Anika PatelDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BibliometricsGeneral PracticePeriodicals as TopicSocial MediaBiomedical ResearchHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26719483
PMCPMC4684037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.