Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719459›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Rhetoric and reality in person-centred care: introducing the House of Care framework.

Nigel Mathers, David Paynton

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Are we stripping the care out of care plans?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  10. NNTs and NNHs: essential for rational prescribing.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  11. Building the House of Care for people with long-term conditions: the foundation of the House of Care framework.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  12. How to support patient-centred care: roof of the House of Care framework.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  13. Rhetoric and reality in person-centred care: introducing the House of Care framework.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  14. Enablers and barriers for engaged, informed individuals and carers: left wall of the House of Care framework.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nigel MathersRCGP and Professor of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
David PayntonRoyal College of General Practitioners, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Public SectorHumansPatient-Centered CareState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26719459
PMCPMC4684003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.