Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719448›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

In Vitro Efficacy of Nonantibiotic Treatments on Biofilm Disruption of Gram-Negative Pathogens and an In Vivo Model of Infectious Endometritis Utilizing Isolates from the Equine Uterus.

Ryan A Ferris, Patrick M McCue, Grace I Borlee, Kristen D Loncar, Margo L Hennet, Bradley R Borlee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Adjunctive intravesical EDTA-tromethamine treatment of a biofilm-associated recurrentThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Complete Genome Sequences of Eight Streptococcus equi subsp.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan A FerrisDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA rferris@colostate.edu brad.borlee@colostate.edu.
Patrick M McCueDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Grace I BorleeDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Kristen D LoncarDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Margo L HennetDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Bradley R BorleeDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA rferris@colostate.edu brad.borlee@colostate.edu.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the ability of the equine clinical treatments N-acetylcysteine, EDTA, and hydrogen peroxide to disrupt in vitro biofilms and kill equine reproductive pathogens (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or Klebsiella pneumoniae) isolated from clinical cases. N-acetylcysteine (3.3%) decreased biofilm biomass and killed bacteria within the biofilms of E. coli isolates. The CFU of recoverable P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae isolates were decreased, but the biofilm biomass was unchanged. Exposure to hydrogen peroxide (1%) decreased the biofilm biomass and reduced the CFU of E. coli isolates, K. pneumoniae isolates were observed to have a reduction in CFU, and minimal effects were observed for P. aeruginosa isolates. Chelating agents (EDTA formulations) reduced E. coli CFU but were ineffective at disrupting preformed biofilms or decreasing the CFU of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae within a biofilm. No single nonantibiotic treatment commonly used in equine veterinary practice was able to reduce the CFU and biofilm biomass of all three Gram-negative species of bacteria evaluated. An in vivo equine model of infectious endometritis was also developed to monitor biofilm formation, utilizing bioluminescence imaging with equine P. aeruginosa isolates from this study. Following infection, the endometrial surface contained focal areas of bacterial growth encased in a strongly adherent "biofilm-like" matrix, suggesting that biofilms are present during clinical cases of infectious equine endometritis. Our results indicate that Gram-negative bacteria isolated from the equine uterus are capable of producing a biofilm in vitro, and P. aeruginosa is capable of producing biofilm-like material in vivo.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAcetylcysteineAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBiofilmsBiomassEdetic AcidEndometritisFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaHorsesHydrogen PeroxideLuminescent MeasurementsMicrobial ViabilityStaining and LabelingUterusAcetylcysteineAnti-Infective AgentsEdetic AcidHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID26719448
PMCPMC4768000
OpenAlexW2219259530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.