Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719435›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Performances of Four Real-Time PCR Assays for Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia.

Milène Sasso, Elsa Chastang-Dumas, Sophie Bastide, Sandrine Alonso, Catherine Lechiche, Nathalie Bourgeois, Laurence Lachaud

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Concurrent Infection with SARS-CoV-2 andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. No Change ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Molecular Diagnosis ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparative Evaluation Between the RealStarAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Therapy and Management ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Diagnostic workup for ARDS patients.Intensive care medicine · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Milène SassoLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Nîmes et Faculté de Médecine de Montpellier-Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Elsa Chastang-DumasLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Nîmes et Faculté de Médecine de Montpellier-Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Sophie BastideBESPIM (Biostatistique, Epidémiologie Clinique, Santé Publique et Information Médicale), CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Sandrine AlonsoBESPIM (Biostatistique, Epidémiologie Clinique, Santé Publique et Information Médicale), CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Catherine LechicheService de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Nathalie BourgeoisDépartement de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Laurence LachaudLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Nîmes et Faculté de Médecine de Montpellier-Nîmes, Nîmes, France laurence.lachaud@univ-montp1.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia due to Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) is a frequent infection among HIV-positive or other immunocompromised patients. In the past several years, PCR on pulmonary samples has become an essential element for the laboratory diagnosis of PCP. Nevertheless, very few comparative studies of available PCR assays have been published. In this work, we evaluated the concordance between four real-time PCR assays, including three commercial kits, AmpliSens, MycAssay, and Bio-Evolution PCR, and an in-house PCR (J. Fillaux et al. 2008, J Microbiol Methods 75:258-261, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.06.009), on 148 pulmonary samples. The results showed concordance rates ranging from 81.6% to 96.6% (kappa, 0.64 to 0.93). Concordance was excellent between three assays: the in-house assay, AmpliSens, and the MycAssay PCR (kappa, >0.8). The performances of these PCR assays were also evaluated according to the classification of the probability of PCP (proven, probable, possible, or no final diagnosis of PCP) based on clinical and radiological signs as well as on the direct examination of bronchoalveolar lavage samples. In the proven PCP category, Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA was detected with all four assays. In the probable PCP category, the in-house PCR, AmpliSens, and the MycAssay PCR were positive for all samples, while the Bio-Evolution PCR failed to detect Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in two samples. In the possible PCP category, the percentage of positive samples according to PCR varied from 54.5% to 86.4%. Detection of colonized patients is discussed. Finally, among the four evaluated PCR assays, one was not suitable for colonization detection but showed good performance in the proven and probable PCP groups. For the three other assays, performances were excellent and allowed detection of a very low fungal burden.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia, PneumocystisReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID26719435
PMCPMC4767985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.