Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719321›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care: evidence from a cross-sectional national exit survey of HIV and non-HIV service users in Zambia.

Emily Dansereau, Felix Masiye, Emmanuela Gakidou, Samuel H Masters, Roy Burstein, Santosh Kumar

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A qualitative study of factors resulting in care delays for adults with meningitis in Zambia.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An integrative model of patients' perceived value of healthcare service quality in North Cyprus.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily DansereauDepartment of Public Health, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Felix MasiyeDepartment of Economics, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Emmanuela GakidouDepartment of Public Health, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Samuel H MastersDepartment of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Roy BursteinDepartment of Public Health, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Economics & International Business, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the associations between perceived quality of care and patient satisfaction among HIV and non-HIV patients in Zambia.

settingPatient exit survey conducted at 104 primary, secondary and tertiary health clinics across 16 Zambian districts.

participants2789 exiting patients. PRIMARY INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Five dimensions of perceived quality of care (health personnel practice and conduct, adequacy of resources and services, healthcare delivery, accessibility of care, and cost of care). SECONDARY INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Respondent, visit-related, and facility characteristics. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient satisfaction measured on a 1-10 scale.

methodsIndices of perceived quality of care were modelled using principal component analysis. Statistical associations between perceived quality of care and patient satisfaction were examined using random-effect ordered logistic regression models, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, visit and facility characteristics.

resultsAverage satisfaction was 6.9 on a 10-point scale for non-HIV services and 7.3 for HIV services. Favourable perceptions of health personnel conduct were associated with higher odds of overall satisfaction for non-HIV (OR=3.53, 95% CI 2.34 to 5.33) and HIV (OR=11.00, 95% CI 3.97 to 30.51) visits. Better perceptions of resources and services were also associated with higher odds of satisfaction for both non-HIV (OR=1.66, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.55) and HIV (OR=4.68, 95% CI 1.81 to 12.10) visits. Two additional dimensions of perceived quality of care--healthcare delivery and accessibility of care--were positively associated with higher satisfaction for non-HIV patients. The odds of overall satisfaction were lower in rural facilities for non-HIV patients (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.99) and HIV patients (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.41). For non-HIV patients, the odds of satisfaction were greater in hospitals compared with health centres/posts (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.48) and lower at publicly-managed facilities (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.27 to 0.64).

conclusionsPerceived quality of care is an important driver of patient satisfaction with health service delivery in Zambia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHospitalsHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMalePatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareExit interviewHIVPatient satisfactionPerceived quality of careZambia

Identifiers

PMID26719321
PMCPMC4710828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.