Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719279›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Membrane Perturbation-Associated Ca2+ Signaling and Incoming Genome Sensing Are Required for the Host Response to Low-Level Enveloped Virus Particle Entry.

David N Hare, Susan E Collins, Subhendu Mukherjee, Yueh-Ming Loo, Michael Gale, Luke J Janssen, Karen L Mossman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The CaJournal of virology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial-induced cell fusion is a danger signal triggering cGAS-STING pathway via micronuclei formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Innate Immune Mechanisms and Herpes Simplex Virus Infection and Disease.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David N HareDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E CollinsDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Subhendu MukherjeeFirestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Yueh-Ming LooDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-7273
Michael GaleDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Luke J JanssenFirestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Karen L MossmanDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada mossk@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

West Nile Virus and host control of innate defensesU19AI083019 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GALE, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2018
$22.5M
Innate Immune Control of West Nile VirusR01AI104002 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DIAMOND, MICHAEL S, GALE, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 57669NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104002NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI083019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe type I interferon (IFN) response is an important aspect of innate antiviral defense, and the transcription factor IRF3 plays an important role in its induction. Membrane perturbation during fusion, a necessary step for enveloped virus particle entry, appears sufficient to induce transcription of a subset of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) in an IRF3-dependent, IFN-independent fashion. IRF3 is emerging as a central node in host cell stress responses, although it remains unclear how different forms of stress activate IRF3. Here, we investigated the minimum number of Sendai virus (SeV) and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) particles required to activate IRF3 and trigger an antiviral response. We found that Ca(2+) signaling associated with membrane perturbation and recognition of incoming viral genomes by cytosolic nucleic acid receptors are required to activate IRF3 in response to fewer than 13 particles of SeV and 84 particles of HCMV per cell. Moreover, it appears that Ca(2+) signaling is important for activation of STING and IRF3 following HCMV particle entry, suggesting that Ca(2+) signaling sensitizes cells to recognize genomes within incoming virus particles. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that cytosolic nucleic acid sensors recognize genomes within incoming virus particles prior to virus replication. These studies highlight the exquisite sensitivity of the cellular response to low-level stimuli and suggest that virus particle entry is sensed as a stress signal. IMPORTANCE: The mechanism by which replicating viruses trigger IRF3 activation and type I IFN induction through the generation and accumulation of viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns has been well characterized. However, the mechanism by which enveloped virus particle entry mediates a stress response, leading to IRF3 activation and the IFN-independent response, remained elusive. Here, we find that Ca(2+) signaling associated with membrane perturbation appears to sensitize cells to recognize genomes within incoming virus particles. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that cytosolic receptors recognize genomes within incoming virus particles prior to virus replication. These findings not only highlight the sensitivity of cellular responses to low-level virus particle stimulation, but provide important insights into how nonreplicating virus vectors or synthetic lipid-based carriers used as clinical delivery vehicles activate innate immune responses.

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, InnateVirus InternalizationAnimalsCell LineCytomegalovirusHumansInterferon Regulatory Factor-3MiceMice, KnockoutSendai virusInterferon Regulatory Factor-3IRF3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26719279
PMCPMC4810640
OpenAlexW2211243458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.