Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719219›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2016

Antibody-Based Biologics and Their Promise to Combat Staphylococcus aureus Infections.

William E Sause, Peter T Buckley, William R Strohl, A Simon Lynch, Victor J Torres

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EPY001, a Novel Monoclonal Antibody AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The virulence toolkit of Staphylococcus aureus: a comprehensive review of toxin diversity, molecular mechanisms, and clinical implications.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. DisarmingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Methicillin-resistantCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Surface-Shaving ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William E SauseDepartment of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Peter T BuckleyJanssen Research & Development LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
William R StrohlJanssen Research & Development LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
A Simon LynchJanssen Research & Development LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, PA 19477, USA. Electronic address: alynch2@its.jnj.com.
Victor J TorresDepartment of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: victor.torres@nyumc.org.

Funding

Mechanistic Studies Of The Staphylococcus aureus LukAB CytotoxinR01AI099394 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Victor J. Torres · 2013 to 2026
$6.1M
Contribution of LukED to Staphylococcus aureus pathobiologyR01AI105129 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI TORRES, VICTOR J. · 2014 to 2023
$4.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099394NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI105129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing incidence of serious infections mediated by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains poses a significant risk to public health. This risk is exacerbated by a prolonged void in the discovery and development of truly novel antibiotics and the absence of a vaccine. These gaps have created renewed interest in the use of biologics in the prevention and treatment of serious staphylococcal infections. In this review, we focus on efforts towards the discovery and development of antibody-based biologic agents and their potential as clinical agents in the management of serious S. aureus infections. Recent promising data for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting anthrax and Ebola highlight the potential of antibody-based biologics as therapeutic agents for serious infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological FactorsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological Factorsantibodybiologicsimmune evasioninfectious diseasesMRSA

Identifiers

PMID26719219
PMCPMC4764385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.