Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719168›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2016

Cortical neuron activation induced by electromagnetic stimulation: a quantitative analysis via modelling and simulation.

Tiecheng Wu, Jie Fan, Kim Seng Lee, Xiaoping Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of dendritic CaJournal of computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiecheng WuNeuroengineering Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Block EA #04-25, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.
Jie FanNeuroengineering Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Block EA #04-25, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.
Kim Seng LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Xiaoping LiNeuroengineering Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Block EA #04-25, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore. mpelixp@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7975-366X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous simulation works concerned with the mechanism of non-invasive neuromodulation has isolated many of the factors that can influence stimulation potency, but an inclusive account of the interplay between these factors on realistic neurons is still lacking. To give a comprehensive investigation on the stimulation-evoked neuronal activation, we developed a simulation scheme which incorporates highly detailed physiological and morphological properties of pyramidal cells. The model was implemented on a multitude of neurons; their thresholds and corresponding activation points with respect to various field directions and pulse waveforms were recorded. The results showed that the simulated thresholds had a minor anisotropy and reached minimum when the field direction was parallel to the dendritic-somatic axis; the layer 5 pyramidal cells always had lower thresholds but substantial variances were also observed within layers; reducing pulse length could magnify the threshold values as well as the variance; tortuosity and arborization of axonal segments could obstruct action potential initiation. The dependence of the initiation sites on both the orientation and the duration of the stimulus implies that the cellular excitability might represent the result of the competition between various firing-capable axonal components, each with a unique susceptibility determined by the local geometry. Moreover, the measurements obtained in simulation intimately resemble recordings in physiological and clinical studies, which seems to suggest that, with minimum simplification of the neuron model, the cable theory-based simulation approach can have sufficient verisimilitude to give quantitatively accurate evaluation of cell activities in response to the externally applied field.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationElectromagnetic PhenomenaModels, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAxonsCerebral CortexElectric StimulationNeuronsNonlinear DynamicsAction potential initiation pointComputer simulationNeuromodulationPyramidal cellStimulation threshold

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.