Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719152›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2016

Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men.

Vicente Taasan, Anita Wokhlu, Michael V Taasan, Raman S Dusaj, Ajay Mehta, Steven Kraft, David Winchester, David Wymer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Significant myocardial perfusion defect during stress visible in prone but not in supine imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Prone-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: An alternative standard in clinical practice?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Men are from Mars and women are from Venus: The nuclear cardiology point of view.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  7. The Private Practice Corner: A new column in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Reducing radiation to patients and improving image quality in a real-world nuclear cardiology laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  9. Combined supine and prone imaging acquisition in cardiac SPECT: A turn for the better.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vicente TaasanMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA. vicente.taasan@va.gov.
Anita WokhluMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
Michael V TaasanMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
Raman S DusajLeHigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.
Ajay MehtaMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
Steven KraftMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
David WinchesterMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
David WymerMalcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
Malcom Randall VA Medical Center · USFlorida College · USHealth Net · USLake City VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging (CSP MPI) has been shown to reduce attenuation artifact in comparison to supine-only (SU) MPI in mixed-gender populations with varying risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), often where patients served as their own controls. However, there is limited direct comparison of these imaging strategies in men.

methods934 male patients underwent CSP or SU MPI. Diagnostic certainty of interpretation was compared. Within the cohort, 116 were referred for left heart catheterization (LHC) to assess for CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared with additional analysis based on body mass index (BMI).

results597 patients completed the SU protocol and 337 patients completed the CSP protocol. Equivocal studies were seen more frequently in the SU group (13%) than in the CSP group (4%, P < .001). At catheterization, the specificity for CSP MPI of 70% was higher than 40% for SU MPI (P = .032). The CSP AUC (0.80 ± 0.06) was significantly larger than SU AUC (0.57 ± 0.05, P = .004). CSP specificity was significantly higher in obese patients.

conclusionsCSP MPI increases diagnostic certainty and improves test accuracy for CAD detection in men with CAD risk factors, especially obese patients, compared to SU MPI.

Indexed as

Cardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted TomographyComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFloridaHumansMaleMen's HealthMyocardial Perfusion ImagingObesityPatient PositioningPrevalenceProne PositionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySupine Positioncoronary artery diseaseimage artifactsMyocardial perfusion imagingtetrofosmin

Identifiers

PMID26719152
OpenAlexW2203836022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.