Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719057›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2016

An in vivo molecular response analysis of colorectal cancer treated with Astragalus membranaceus extract.

Ailun Tseng, Chih-Hsueh Yang, Chih-Hao Chen, Chang-Han Chen, Shih-Lan Hsu, Mei-Hsien Lee, Hoong-Chien Lee, Li-Jen Su

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Uncovering the effects and molecular mechanism ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effect ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Induction of Apoptosis by Ethyl Acetate Fraction ofJournal of pharmacopuncture · 2018
    Article
  16. Bioscience reports · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ailun TsengInstitute of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chih-Hsueh YangGraduate Institute of Microbiology and Public Health, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chih-Hao ChenInstitute of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chang-Han ChenInstitute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Shih-Lan HsuDepartment of Education and Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Mei-Hsien LeeGraduate Institute of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Hoong-Chien LeeCenter for Dynamical Biomarkers and Translational Medicine, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Li-Jen SuInstitute of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan, R.O.C.
National Central University · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fact that many chemotherapeutic drugs cause chemoresistance and side effects during the course of colorectal cancer treatment necessitates development of novel cytotoxic agents aiming to attenuate new molecular targets. Here, we show that Astragalus membranaceus (Fischer) Bge. var. mongolicus (Bge.) Hsiao (AM), a traditional Chinese medicine, can inhibit tumor growth in vivo and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. The antitumor effect of AM was assessed on the subcutaneous tumors of human colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 grafted into nude mice. The mice were treated with either water or 500 mg/kg AM once per day, before being sacrificed for extraction of tumors, which were then subjected to microarray expression profiling. The gene expression of the extraction was then profiled using microarray analysis. The identified genes differentially expressed between treated mice and controls reveal that administration of AM suppresses chromosome organization, histone modification, and regulation of macromolecule metabolic process. A separate analysis focused on differentially expressed microRNAs revealing involvement of macromolecule metabolism, and intracellular transport, as well as several cancer signaling pathways. For validation, the input of the identified genes to The Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures led to many chemopreventive agents of natural origin that produce similar gene expression profiles to that of AM. The demonstrated effectiveness of AM suggests a potential therapeutic drug for colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAstragalus propinquusColorectal NeoplasmsDrugs, Chinese HerbalHCT116 CellsHumansMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMiceMice, NudeOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscriptomeXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDrugs, Chinese Herbal

Identifiers

PMID26719057
PMCPMC4689484
OpenAlexW2179719743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.