Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26719012›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2015

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effects of Switching to 20 mg Esomeprazole on Reflux Symptoms and Quality of Life.

Fuminao Takeshima, Keiichi Hashiguchi, Yasunori Onitsuka, Ken Tanigawa, Hitomi Minami, Kayoko Matsushima, Yuko Akazawa, Ken Shiozawa, Naoyuki Yamaguchi, Naota Taura and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fuminao TakeshimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Keiichi HashiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yasunori OnitsukaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Onitsuka Clinic of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ken TanigawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tanigawa Clinic of Radiology and Gastroenterology, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hitomi Minami0.
Kayoko MatsushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuko AkazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ken Shiozawa0.
Naoyuki YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Naota TauraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ken OhnitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tatsuki Ichikawa0.
Hajime IsomotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nagasaki University Hospital · JPAsics (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may deteriorate patient quality of life (QOL) despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Nineteen Japanese institutions were surveyed to determine the clinical characteristics and QOL of patients with refractory GERD. Those patients treated with a conventional PPI were switched to 20 mg esomeprazole for 4 weeks. Symptoms and QOL were assessed using Global Overall Symptom and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaires at baseline and at 2 and/or 4 weeks of esomeprazole treatment. RESULTS Of 120 patients who completed the survey, 58 (48.3%) had refractory GERD. Of these, 69.0% were aged ≥ 65 years, 79.3% were prescribed a PPI at a standard or high dose, and 22.4% were prescribed a PPI together with another drug. After switching to esomeprazole, patients reported significant improvements in heartburn, acid regurgitation, and excessive belching at 2 weeks using a symptom diary, as well as the total score, reflux, abdominal pain, and indigestion, which were assessed using the GSRS at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS About half of Japanese patients with GERD may be refractory to conventional PPIs. Their reflux-related symptoms are often severe and may impair QOL. Switching to esomeprazole could be used to improve their symptoms and QOL.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsomeprazoleFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProton Pump InhibitorsQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeEsomeprazoleProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26719012
PMCPMC4700865
OpenAlexW2206000528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.