Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26718850›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2016

Barn owl feathers as biomonitors of mercury: sources of variation in sampling procedures.

Inês Roque, Rui Lourenço, Ana Marques, João Pedro Coelho, Cláudia Coelho, Eduarda Pereira, João E Rabaça, Alexandre Roulin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biomonitoring of toxic metals in feathers of predatory birds from eastern regions of Hungary.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inês RoqueLabOr - Laboratório de Ornitologia, ICAAM - Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal. iroque@uevora.pt.
Rui LourençoLabOr - Laboratório de Ornitologia, ICAAM - Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal.
Ana MarquesLabOr - Laboratório de Ornitologia, ICAAM - Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal.
João Pedro CoelhoCESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Cláudia CoelhoCESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Eduarda PereiraCESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
João E RabaçaLabOr - Laboratório de Ornitologia, ICAAM - Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal.
Alexandre RoulinDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Évora · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PTUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given their central role in mercury (Hg) excretion and suitability as reservoirs, bird feathers are useful Hg biomonitors. Nevertheless, the interpretation of Hg concentrations is still questioned as a result of a poor knowledge of feather physiology and mechanisms affecting Hg deposition. Given the constraints of feather availability to ecotoxicological studies, we tested the effect of intra-individual differences in Hg concentrations according to feather type (body vs. flight feathers), position in the wing and size (mass and length) in order to understand how these factors could affect Hg estimates. We measured Hg concentration of 154 feathers from 28 un-moulted barn owls (Tyto alba), collected dead on roadsides. Median Hg concentration was 0.45 (0.076-4.5) mg kg(-1) in body feathers, 0.44 (0.040-4.9) mg kg(-1) in primary and 0.60 (0.042-4.7) mg kg(-1) in secondary feathers, and we found a poor effect of feather type on intra-individual Hg levels. We also found a negative effect of wing feather mass on Hg concentration but not of feather length and of its position in the wing. We hypothesize that differences in feather growth rate may be the main driver of between-feather differences in Hg concentrations, which can have implications in the interpretation of Hg concentrations in feathers. Finally, we recommend that, whenever possible, several feathers from the same individual should be analysed. The five innermost primaries have lowest mean deviations to both between-feather and intra-individual mean Hg concentration and thus should be selected under restrictive sampling scenarios.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsFeathersMercuryMoltingStrigiformesEnvironmental PollutantsMercuryBarn OwlBiomonitorFeathersIntra-individual variationsMercury

Identifiers

PMID26718850
OpenAlexW2199464802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.