Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26718849›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2015

Oral Immunization with Recombinant Vaccinia Virus Prime and Intramuscular Protein Boost Provides Protection against Intrarectal Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Challenge in Macaques.

Rajesh Thippeshappa, Baoping Tian, Brad Cleveland, Wenjin Guo, Patricia Polacino, Shiu-Lok Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Mucosal vaccine delivery: Current state and a pediatric perspective.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajesh ThippeshappaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Baoping TianDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brad ClevelandDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Wenjin GuoDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Patricia PolacinoWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Shiu-Lok HuDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Hus@wanprc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-7964
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Oral immunization against HIV/AIDS with prime-boost strategiesR01DE021223 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HU, SHIU-LOK · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE021223NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021223NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquisition occurs predominantly through mucosal transmission. We hypothesized that greater mucosal immune responses and protective efficacy against mucosal HIV-1 infection may be achieved by prime-boost immunization at mucosal sites. We used a macaque model to determine the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of orally delivered, replication-competent but attenuated recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing full-length HIV-1 SF162 envelope (Env) or simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Gag-Pol proteins. We examined the dose and route that are suitable for oral immunization with recombinant vaccinia viruses. We showed that sublingual inoculation of two vaccinia virus-naive pigtailed macaques with 5 × 10(8) PFU of recombinant vaccinia viruses was safe. However, sublingual inoculation with a higher dose or tonsillar inoculation resulted in secondary oral lesions, indicating the need to optimize the dose and route for oral immunization with replication-competent vaccinia virus vectors. Oral priming alone elicited antibody responses to vaccinia virus and to the SF162 Env protein. Intramuscular immunization with the SF162 gp120 protein at either 20 or 21 weeks postpriming resulted in a significant boost in antibody responses in both systemic and mucosal compartments. Furthermore, we showed that immune responses induced by recombinant vaccinia virus priming and intramuscular protein boosting provided protection against intrarectal challenge with the simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV-SF162-P4.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsFusion Proteins, gag-polHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Envelope Protein gp160Immunity, MucosalImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMacaca mulattaVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticVaccinia virusAIDS VaccinesFusion Proteins, gag-polgp120 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1gp160 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Envelope Protein gp160Immunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID26718849
PMCPMC4783425
OpenAlexW2294042646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.