ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2016
Managing novel orally administered anticoagulants in patients undergoing urogynaecological surgery.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of novel orally administered anticoagulant agents (NOACs) provides new challenges to clinicians in the perioperative care of patients undergoing urogynaecological surgery. We aimed to assess evidence for managing patients taking NOACs before and after urogynaecological surgery. We conducted a literature search in CINAHL, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Cochrane Library and PubMed for original research articles in the English language on this topic. However, despite initially identifying 556 articles, no articles pertained to the use of NOACs in urogynaecological surgery. We subsequently reviewed national and international guidance on managing patients prescribed NOACs and created a concise guideline to aid urogynaecologists in the perioperative care of these patients. Consensus is needed on perioperative optimisation of anticoagulation in urogynaecological patients using NOACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26718781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.