ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2016
Primary intracranial soft tissue sarcomas in children, adolescents, and young adults: single institution experience and review of the literature.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Intracranial DICER-1 Mutant Sarcoma: A Systematic Review of Existing Literature from 2000 to 2024.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Recurrent primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER1-mutant in a pediatric patient with DICER1 syndrome: the importance of molecular testing.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER-1 mutant, with hemorrhagic presentation: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Increase of primary intracranial sarcoma in children: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- MRI findings of primary intracranial sarcomas in children.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Primary intracranial sarcoma masquerading as a chronic subdural haematoma: illustrative case and review of an unusual phenomenon.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Primary intracranial sarcomas: a clinicopathological investigation.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Myxoid mesenchymal intraventricular brain tumour with EWSR1-CREB1 gene fusion in an adult woman.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021Article
- A 43-year-old man with dural-based mass with bone destruction.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a paucity of literature reporting the outcome of intracranial sarcomas (IS) in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA). A multimodal therapeutic approach is commonly used, with no well-established treatment consensus. We conducted a retrospective review of CAYA with IS, treated at our institution, to determine their clinical findings, treatments, and outcomes. Immunohistochemistry (PDGFRA and EGFR) and DNA sequencing were performed on 5 tumor samples. A literature review of IS was also conducted. We reviewed 13 patients (median age, 7 years) with a primary diagnosis of IS between 1990 and 2015. Diagnoses included unclassified sarcoma (n = 9), chondrosarcoma (n = 2), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2). Five patients underwent upfront gross total resection (GTR) of the tumor. The 5-drug regimen (vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and ifosfamide) was the most common treatment used. Nine patients died due to progression or recurrence (n = 8) or secondary malignancy (n = 1). The median follow-up period of the 4 surviving patients was 1.69 years (range 1.44-5.17 years). The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 21 and 44 %, respectively. BRAF, TP53, KRAS, KIT, ERBB2, MET, RET, ATM, and EGFR mutations were detected in 4 of the 5 tissue samples. All 5 samples were immunopositive for PDGFRA, and only 2 were positive for EGFR. IS remain a therapeutic challenge due to high progression and recurrence rates. Collaborative multi-institutional studies are warranted to delineate a treatment consensus and investigate tumor biology to improve the disease outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.