ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Epidemic Reconstruction in a Phylogenetics Framework: Transmission Trees as Partitions of the Node Set.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- The tree labeling polytope: A unified approach to ancestral reconstruction problems.Cell systems · 2026Article
- A statistical framework for comparing epidemic forests.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility and limitations of whole-genome sequencing via nanopore technology and Bayesian modeling for outbreak transmission inference.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- A new method to estimate factors associated with tuberculosis transmission using whole genome sequencing and other additional metadata.Epidemiologic methods · 2026Article
- A graph homomorphism approach for unraveling histories of metastatic cancers and viral outbreaks under evolutionary constraints.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Within-host bacterial evolution and the emergence of pathogenicity.Nature microbiology · 2025Review
- ScITree: Scalable Bayesian inference of transmission tree from epidemiological and genomic data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Incorporating Epidemiological Data into the Genomic Analysis of Partially Sampled Infectious Disease Outbreaks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- JUNIPER: Reconstructing Transmission Events from Next-Generation Sequencing Data at Scale.Research square · 2025Article
- JUNIPER: Reconstructing Transmission Events from Next-Generation Sequencing Data at Scale.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Bayesian estimation of transmission networks for infectious diseases.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delay distributions of infectious diseases.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Inference of Infectious Disease Transmission through a Relaxed Bottleneck Using Multiple Genomes Per Host.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- A Bayesian inference method to estimate transmission trees with multiple introductions; applied to SARS-CoV-2 in Dutch mink farms.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Inferring Viral Transmission Pathways from Within-Host Variation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Genomic epidemiology offers high resolution estimates of serial intervals for COVID-19.Nature communications · 2023Article
- ComparingEpidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- Combined Phylogeographic Analyses and Epidemiologic Contact Tracing to Characterize Atypically Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H3N1) Epidemic, Belgium, 2019.Emerging infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Quantifying the value of viral genomics when inferring who infected whom in the 2014-16 Ebola virus outbreak in Guinea.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- Using genetic data to identify transmission risk factors: Statistical assessment and application to tuberculosis transmission.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The use of genetic data to reconstruct the transmission tree of infectious disease epidemics and outbreaks has been the subject of an increasing number of studies, but previous approaches have usually either made assumptions that are not fully compatible with phylogenetic inference, or, where they have based inference on a phylogeny, have employed a procedure that requires this tree to be fixed. At the same time, the coalescent-based models of the pathogen population that are employed in the methods usually used for time-resolved phylogeny reconstruction are a considerable simplification of epidemic process, as they assume that pathogen lineages mix freely. Here, we contribute a new method that is simultaneously a phylogeny reconstruction method for isolates taken from an epidemic, and a procedure for transmission tree reconstruction. We observe that, if one or more samples is taken from each host in an epidemic or outbreak and these are used to build a phylogeny, a transmission tree is equivalent to a partition of the set of nodes of this phylogeny, such that each partition element is a set of nodes that is connected in the full tree and contains all the tips corresponding to samples taken from one and only one host. We then implement a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) procedure for simultaneous sampling from the spaces of both trees, utilising a newly-designed set of phylogenetic tree proposals that also respect node partitions. We calculate the posterior probability of these partitioned trees based on a model that acknowledges the population structure of an epidemic by employing an individual-based disease transmission model and a coalescent process taking place within each host. We demonstrate our method, first using simulated data, and then with sequences taken from the H7N7 avian influenza outbreak that occurred in the Netherlands in 2003. We show that it is superior to established coalescent methods for reconstructing the topology and node heights of the phylogeny and performs well for transmission tree reconstruction when the phylogeny is well-resolved by the genetic data, but caution that this will often not be the case in practice and that existing genetic and epidemiological data should be used to configure such analyses whenever possible. This method is available for use by the research community as part of BEAST, one of the most widely-used packages for reconstruction of dated phylogenies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.