Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26717111›Full record

ReviewShock (Augusta, Ga.)2016

Autodigestion: Proteolytic Degradation and Multiple Organ Failure in Shock.

Angelina E Altshuler, Erik B Kistler, Geert W Schmid-Schönbein

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aging by autodigestion.PloS one · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Gut-Lung Axis in Systemic Inflammation. Role of Mesenteric Lymph as a Conduit.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Mechanisms of I/R-Induced Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilator Dysfunction.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. What's New in Shock, May 2016?Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angelina E Altshuler*Department of Bioengineering, The Institute of Engineering in Medicine, University of California San Diego †Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California.
Erik B Kistler
Geert W Schmid-Schönbein
VA San Diego Healthcare System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Integrative Bioengineering of Heart, Vessels, and BloodT32HL105373 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHIEN, SHU, INTAGLIETTA, MARCOS · 2010 to 2019
$3.6M
Digestive Enzymes and Microvascular Inflammation in ShockR01GM085072 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHMID-SCHOENBEIN, GEERT W. · 2009 to 2017
$2.2M
The Role of Intestinal Digestive Enzymes in Circulatory ShockIK2BX001277 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI KISTLER, ERIK · 2012 to 2016
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX001277NIGMS NIH HHS GM 85072NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no effective treatment for multiorgan failure following shock other than supportive care. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of these sequelae to shock is required. The intestine plays a central role in multiorgan failure. It was previously suggested that bacteria and their toxins are responsible for the organ failure seen in circulatory shock, but clinical trials in septic patients have not confirmed this hypothesis. Instead, we review here evidence that the digestive enzymes, synthesized in the pancreas and discharged into the small intestine as requirement for normal digestion, may play a role in multiorgan failure. These powerful enzymes are nonspecific, highly concentrated, and fully activated in the lumen of the intestine. During normal digestion they are compartmentalized in the lumen of the intestine by the mucosal epithelial barrier. However, if this barrier becomes permeable, e.g. in an ischemic state, the digestive enzymes escape into the wall of the intestine. They digest tissues in the mucosa and generate small molecular weight cytotoxic fragments such as unbound free fatty acids. Digestive enzymes may also escape into the systemic circulation and activate other degrading proteases. These proteases have the ability to clip the ectodomain of surface receptors and compromise their function, for example cleaving the insulin receptor causing insulin resistance. The combination of digestive enzymes and cytotoxic fragments leaking into the central circulation causes cell and organ dysfunction, and ultimately may lead to complete organ failure and death. We summarize current evidence suggesting that enteral blockade of digestive enzymes inside the lumen of the intestine may serve to reduce acute cell and organ damage and improve survival in experimental shock.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnzymesHumansInsulin ResistanceMultiple Organ FailurePancreasPeptide HydrolasesShockEnzymesPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID26717111
PMCPMC4833612
OpenAlexW2197467506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.