ArticlemAbs2016
The INNs and outs of antibody nonproprietary names.
Article in mAbs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- h3B7A-LDM, a novel anti-mesothelin antibody-drug conjugate with the potential to induce antitumor immunity, shows potent efficacy against solid tumors.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Article
- Nomenclature of therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: A journey through time and terminology.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies in Breast Milk of Mothers Vaccinated with Three Different Vaccines in Mexico.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Engineering Strategies to Overcome the Stability-Function Trade-Off in Proteins.ACS synthetic biology · 2022Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Driving CARs with alternative navigation tools - the potential of engineered binding scaffolds.The FEBS journal · 2021Review
- Effective rational humanization of a PASylated anti-galectin-3 Fab for the sensitive PET imaging of thyroid cancer in vivo.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Selected Biological Medicinal Products and Their Veterinary Use.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- Affinity maturation, humanization, and co-crystallization of a rabbit anti-human ROR2 monoclonal antibody for therapeutic applications.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Quantifying the nativeness of antibody sequences using long short-term memory networks.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2019Article
- Article
- Nomenclature of humanized mAbs: Early concepts, current challenges and future perspectives.Human antibodies · 2019Review
- Article
- Generating FN3-Based Affinity Reagents Through Phage Display.Current protocols in chemical biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Identification and Quantitation of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in the Clinical Laboratory.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017Review
- Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody-drug conjugates.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2017Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) for Personalized Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Review.Advances in therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An important step in drug development is the assignment of an International Nonproprietary Name (INN) by the World Health Organization (WHO) that provides healthcare professionals with a unique and universally available designated name to identify each pharmaceutical substance. Monoclonal antibody INNs comprise a -mab suffix preceded by a substem indicating the antibody type, e.g., chimeric (-xi-), humanized (-zu-), or human (-u-). The WHO publishes INN definitions that specify how new monoclonal antibody therapeutics are categorized and adapts the definitions to new technologies. However, rapid progress in antibody technologies has blurred the boundaries between existing antibody categories and created a burgeoning array of new antibody formats. Thus, revising the INN system for antibodies is akin to aiming for a rapidly moving target. The WHO recently revised INN definitions for antibodies now to be based on amino acid sequence identity. These new definitions, however, are critically flawed as they are ambiguous and go against decades of scientific literature. A key concern is the imposition of an arbitrary threshold for identity against human germline antibody variable region sequences. This leads to inconsistent classification of somatically mutated human antibodies, humanized antibodies as well as antibodies derived from semi-synthetic/synthetic libraries and transgenic animals. Such sequence-based classification implies clear functional distinction between categories (e.g., immunogenicity). However, there is no scientific evidence to support this. Dialog between the WHO INN Expert Group and key stakeholders is needed to develop a new INN system for antibodies and to avoid confusion and miscommunication between researchers and clinicians prescribing antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.