Trial reportOncotarget2016
Adenovirus-mediated delivery of herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase administration improves outcome of recurrent high-grade glioma.
Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00870181 (Adenovirus-Mediated Delivery of Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase Administration Improves Outcome of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adenovirus-Mediated Delivery of Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase Administration Improves Outcome of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of vaccination therapy in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma patients: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements and challenges: immunotherapy therapy in high-grade glioma - a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Ganciclovir as a potential treatment for glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of innate and adaptive immunotherapy combined with standard of care in high-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review on intra-arterial cerebral infusions of chemotherapeutics in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: The state-of-the-art.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Strategies for Improved Intra-arterial Treatments Targeting Brain Tumors: a Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- The promise of immunotherapy for central nervous system tumours.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Approaches for Glioblastoma Treatment: Advances and Future Prospects.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas.Cancers · 2025Review
- Brain-targeting drug delivery systems: The state of the art in treatment of glioblastoma.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2024Review
- The potential of gene delivery for the treatment of traumatic brain injury.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Brain Tumor Care: Emerging Technologies and Strategies.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Review
- Novel Clinical Trials and Approaches in the Management of Glioblastoma.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Immunotherapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Challenges and prospects in geriatric epilepsy treatment: the role of the blood-brain barrier in pharmacotherapy and drug delivery.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
- Cell and gene therapy in neuro-oncology.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2024Review
- Oncolytic Virotherapy for High-Grade Glioma and Current Evidence and Factors to Consider for Incorporation into Clinical Practice.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial was conducted to assess the anti-tumor efficacy and safety of replication-deficient adenovirus mutant thymidine kinase (ADV-TK) in combination with ganciclovir administration in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG). PATIENTS AND
methods53 patients with recurrent HGG were randomly allocated to receive intra-arterial cerebral infusion of ADV-TK or conventional treatments. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and clinical benefit. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00870181.
resultsIn ADV-TK group, PFS-6 was 54.5%, the median PFS was 29.6 weeks, the median OS was 45.4 weeks, and better survivals were achieved when compared with control group. The one-year PFS and OS were 22.7% and 44.6% in ADV-TK group respectively, and clinical benefit was 68.2%. There are 2 patients alive for more than 4 years without progression in ADV-TK group. In the subgroup of glioblastoma received ADV-TK, PFS-6 was 71.4%, median PFS was 34.9 weeks, median OS was 45.7 weeks respectively, much better than those in control group. The one-year PFS and OS were 35.7% and 50.0% in ADV-TK group respectively. ADV-TK/ganciclovir gene therapy was well tolerated, and no treatment-related severe adverse events were noted.
conclusionOur study demonstrated a notable improvement of PFS-6, PFS and OS in ADV-TK treated group, and the efficacy and safety appear to be comparable to other reported treatments used for recurrent HGG. ADV-TK gene therapy is therefore a valuable therapeutic option for recurrent HGG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.