Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26716390›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in supportive and palliative care2016

How to ask and what to do: a guide for clinical inquiry and intervention regarding female sexual health after cancer.

Sharon L Bober, Jennifer B Reese, Lisa Barbera, Andrea Bradford, Kristen M Carpenter, Shari Goldfarb, Jeanne Carter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in supportive and palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Let's talk about sex: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology: clinical recommendations after pelvic radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Addressing sexual health after cancer: whose job is it anyway? Provider practices and communication barriers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Gynecologic cancer survivor preferences for provider communication regarding sexual health after treatment: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Overview of sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharon L BoberaDana-Farber Cancer Institute bHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts cCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center dDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA eDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Odette Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada fDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center gOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio hDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center iDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College jDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center kDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center lDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA.
Jennifer B Reese
Lisa Barbera
Andrea Bradford
Kristen M Carpenter
Shari Goldfarb
Jeanne Carter
Cornell University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAs the number of female cancer survivors continues to grow, there is a growing need to bridge the gap between the high rate of women's cancer-related sexual dysfunction and the lack of attention and intervention available to the majority of survivors who suffer from sexual problems. Previously identified barriers that hinder communication for providers include limited time, lack of preparation, and a lack of patient resources and access to appropriate referral sources. RECENT

findingsThis study brings together a recently developed model for approaching clinical inquiry about sexual health with a brief problem checklist that has been adapted for use for female cancer survivors, as well as practical evidence-based strategies on how to address concerns identified on the checklist. Examples of patient education sheets are provided as well as strategies for building a referral network. SUMMARY: By providing access to a concise and efficient tool for clinical inquiry, as well as targeted material resources and practical health-promoting strategies based on recent evidence-based findings, we hope to begin eliminating the barriers that hamper oncology providers from addressing the topic of sexual/vaginal health after cancer.

Indexed as

CommunicationReproductive HealthFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalSurvivorsWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID26716390
PMCPMC4984532
OpenAlexW2197894498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.