Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26716082›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2015

Role of decision aids in orthopaedic surgery.

Isha A Ten Have, Michel Pj van den Bekerom, Derek Fp van Deurzen, Michel Gjs Hageman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isha A Ten HaveIsha A ten Have, Michel PJ van den Bekerom, Derek FP van Deurzen, Michel GJS Hageman, Department of Orthopaedics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel Pj van den BekeromIsha A ten Have, Michel PJ van den Bekerom, Derek FP van Deurzen, Michel GJS Hageman, Department of Orthopaedics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Derek Fp van DeurzenIsha A ten Have, Michel PJ van den Bekerom, Derek FP van Deurzen, Michel GJS Hageman, Department of Orthopaedics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel Gjs HagemanIsha A ten Have, Michel PJ van den Bekerom, Derek FP van Deurzen, Michel GJS Hageman, Department of Orthopaedics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical treatment of patients inherently entails the risk of undesired complication or side effects. It is essential to inform the patient about the expected outcomes, but also the possible undesired outcomes. The patients preference and values regarding the potential outcomes should be involved in the decision making process. Even though many orthopaedic surgeons are positive towards shared decision-making, it is minimally introduced in the orthopaedic daily practice and decision-making is still mostly physician based. Decision aids are designed to support the physician and patient in the shared- decision-making process. By using decision aids, patients can learn more about their condition and treatment options in advance to the decision-making. This will reduce decisional conflict and improve participation and satisfaction.

Indexed as

Decisional conflictEmpowermentOrthopaedic surgeryPatient decision aidShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID26716082
PMCPMC4686433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.